578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9577735)
1. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Postoperative verification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade].
Starzewski J; Góźdź S; Chil A; Piasek G; Plutecki J; Smorag L; Dembowska R; Krawczyk J
Wiad Lek; 2003; 56(3-4):162-6. PubMed ID: 12923964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization: diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy.
Matsuura Y; Kawagoe T; Toki N; Sugihara K; Kashimura M
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 8629405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Independent determinants of inaccuracy of colposcopically directed punch biopsy of the cervix.
Costa S; Nuzzo MD; Rubino A; Rambelli V; Marinelli M; Santini D; Cristiani P; Bucchi L
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 12821342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
Ramirez EJ; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Negative cone biopsies. A reappraisal.
Diakomanolis E; Haidopoulos D; Chatzipapas I; Rodolakis A; Stefanidis K; Markaki S
J Reprod Med; 2003 Aug; 48(8):617-21. PubMed ID: 12971142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and human papillomavirus infection: punch biopsy versus cervical smear.
Gitsch G; Reinthaller A; Tatra G; Breitenecker G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 249(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 1665685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of High-Grade Histopathology Diagnosed by Cervical Conization in Endocervical Curettage Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Case-Control Study.
Cong Q; Xiao J; Tao X; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 32324695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrepancy between colposcopy, punch biopsy and final histology of cone specimen: a prospective study.
Petousis S; Christidis P; Margioula-Siarkou C; Sparangis N; Athanasiadis A; Kalogiannidis I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1271-1275. PubMed ID: 29442140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The appropriateness of examining the entire cervix histologically in hysterectomy specimens from women with a previous history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or dyskaryosis.
Greene A; Heatley MK
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11215286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Significance of punch biopsy and endocervical curretage in diagnostics of cervical intraepithelial lesions].
Panjković M; Ivković-Kapicl T
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2006 Dec; 63(12):995-9. PubMed ID: 17252702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Triage of patients with abnormal cervical smears in the absence of colposcopy.
Omigbodun AO; Thomas JO; Adewole IF; Ogunlusi ML
Trop Geogr Med; 1993; 45(4):157-8. PubMed ID: 7694409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jarmulowicz MR; Jenkins D; Barton SE; Goodall AL; Hollingworth A; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2804008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cyto-colpo-histologic correlation: about an analytical study of 120 colposcopies.
Slimani O; Ben Temim R; Makhlouf T; Mathlouthi N; Attia L
Tunis Med; 2016 Oct; 94(8-9):616-620. PubMed ID: 28685798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
