108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9577743)
21. Cervical endometriosis: a potential pitfall in the evaluation of glandular cells in cervical smears.
Hanau CA; Begley N; Bibbo M
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Mar; 16(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 9099553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [New version of the pathology practice guideline for cervical cytology: sharpened criteria for adequacy; expanded use of new techniques].
van Kemenade FJ; Wiersma T; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1283-6. PubMed ID: 17624158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Composition of cervical smears in patients with and without a cervical ectropion.
Buntinx F; Essed GG; Van der Putten HW; Buchholz RF; Arends JW; Knottnerus JA
J Clin Pathol; 1995 May; 48(5):408-9. PubMed ID: 7629284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. When a Pap smear is abnormal.
Harv Womens Health Watch; 2001 Jan; 8(5):2-5. PubMed ID: 11137971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Statement on technical devices for innovation in cervical cytology screening.
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 106(4):441. PubMed ID: 8853029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Educational needs and causes of false diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance at a university hospital.
Kumar N; Sayed S; Moloo Z
Afr J Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 15(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 21987946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ACOG guidelines on cervical screening: a step in the right direction.
Sasieni P; Castañón A; Cuzick J
J Med Screen; 2010; 17(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 20660430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Cellular composition of cervical smears taken by general practitioners.
Kant AC; Palm BT; Dona DJ; Makkus AF; Vooijs GP; Van Weel C
Int J Qual Health Care; 1995 Mar; 7(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7640912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An explanation for the problem of false-negative cervical smears.
Barton SE; Jenkins D; Hollingworth A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Apr; 96(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 2751964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The "ASCUS" swamp.
Robb JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994 Dec; 11(4):319-20. PubMed ID: 7895569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. HPV testing in cervical cytology practice: it's all about choice.
Stoler MH
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 15839612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Endocervical and vaginal changes in women wearing IUD's].
Botta G; Cerrato G; Corongiu F
Ann Osp Maria Vittoria Torino; 1982; 24(7-12):251-9. PubMed ID: 7137763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A 21-year-old woman with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Sawaya GF
JAMA; 2005 Nov; 294(17):2210-8. PubMed ID: 16264163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Intralaboratory reproducibility in cervical cytology. Results of the application of a 100-slide set.
Confortini M; Biggeri A; Cariaggi MP; Carozzi FM; Minuti PA; Russo A; Palli D
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 8434496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Morphologic changes in cervix smears by intrauterine pessary].
Ortner A; Huber A; Pertoll J; Tabarelli M; Mikuz G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 45(4):244-6. PubMed ID: 4007460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Diagnostic accuracy of vaginal smears and histopathologic studies in the early detection of cervical cancer].
Dolatowski R; Zółtowski M
Ginekol Pol; 1986 Jan; 57(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 3522369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Bethesda system and Pap smear screening.
Miller K
Am Fam Physician; 1995 Feb; 51(2):331-2. PubMed ID: 7840027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Recommendations on Quality Control and Quality Assurance in Cervical Cytology.
Branca M; Longatto-Filho A
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(5):361-9. PubMed ID: 26569109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. WHO cervical cytology screening guidelines--how relevant to us?
du Toit GC
S Afr Med J; 1995 Jan; 85(1):52. PubMed ID: 7784924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
