BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9577744)

  • 1. Rapid rescreening.
    Rubin A
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 9577744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid review.
    Faraker CA
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9660635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control. For how long should we rescreen?
    Farrell DJ; Bilkhu S; Gibson LM; Cummings L; Wadehra V
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 9100751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of primary screening by rapid review: 'to act or not to act on the results, that is the question'.
    Slater DN
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 9577733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partial rescreening of all negative smears: an improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening.
    Faraker CA
    Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8453016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal quality assurance of sensitivity of primary screening.
    Boxer ME
    Cytopathology; 1998 Oct; 9(5):349-50. PubMed ID: 9800134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sensitivity of rapid (partial) review of cervical smears.
    Shield PW; Cox NC
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 9577734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposed guidelines for secondary screening (rescreening) instruments for gynecologic cytology. Intersociety Working Group for Cytology Technologies.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):273-6. PubMed ID: 9479352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whole, Turret and step methods of rapid rescreening: is there any difference in performance?
    Montemor EB; Roteli-Martins CM; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG; Fonsechi-Carvasan GA; Shirata NK; Utagawa ML; Longatto-Filho A; Syrjanen KJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jan; 35(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17173293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid (partial) prescreening of cervical smears: the quality control method of choice?
    Brooke D; Dudding N; Sutton J
    Cytopathology; 2002 Aug; 13(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 12269891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invited commentary--Rapid review: current practice.
    Faraker CA
    Cytopathology; 2001 Aug; 12(4):249-50. PubMed ID: 11488873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement in the routine screening of cervical smears: A study using rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods.
    Tavares SB; Alves de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; Pinheiro de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 21954191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cost-effectiveness of cervical-vaginal rescreening.
    Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):525-36. PubMed ID: 9353091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears as a quality control method.
    Cross PA
    Cytopathology; 1997 Apr; 8(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 9134332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid screening: a comparative study.
    Dudding N; Hewer EM; Lancucki L; Rice S
    Cytopathology; 2001 Aug; 12(4):235-48. PubMed ID: 11488872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changing terminology and screening recommendations in cervical cytology screening programs.
    Robertson DI; Srivannaboon S; Pairwuti S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1992 Jan; 75 Suppl 1():90-3. PubMed ID: 1402489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears: an improved method of quality control.
    Dudding N
    Cytopathology; 1995 Apr; 6(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 7795170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Can microcolpohysteroscopy be used to screen cervical lesions?].
    Hamou J; Frydman R; Fernandez H; Capella S; Taylor S
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1997 May; 25(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 9273106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 100% rapid (partial) rescreening for quality assurance.
    Lemay C; Meisels A
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 9987456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ViraPap: can it help to reduce the need for colposcopy?
    Mareck DG; Woolard DG
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Dec; 11(4):405-14. PubMed ID: 1662859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.