268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9577905)
1. [MRCP (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography)--an assessment of current status].
Merkle EM; Nüssle K; Glasbrenner B; Tomczak R; Preclik G; Rieber A; Adler G; Brambs HJ
Z Gastroenterol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 9577905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quality rating of MR-cholangiopancreatography with oral application of iron oxide particles].
Lorenzen M; Wedegärtner U; Fiehler J; Adam G
Rofo; 2003 Jul; 175(7):936-41. PubMed ID: 12847648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging techniques in patients with biliary obstruction.
Cieszanowski A; Chomicka D; Andrzejewska M; Pruszyński B; Pawlak J; Mustafa AM
Med Sci Monit; 2000; 6(6):1197-202. PubMed ID: 11208479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, indications and clinical results].
Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1997 Dec; 94(6):632-41. PubMed ID: 9524602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings.
Yeh TS; Jan YY; Tseng JH; Chiu CT; Chen TC; Hwang TL; Chen MF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Feb; 95(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 10685746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings.
Stroszczynski C; Hunerbein M
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15965779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Mesrur Halefoglu A
Semin Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 43(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 18774032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnostic possibilities of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography].
Granov AM; Tiutin LA; Berezin SM
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1999; (4):42-5. PubMed ID: 11082691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC
Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Weber C; Kuhlencordt R; Grotelueschen R; Wedegaertner U; Ang TL; Adam G; Soehendra N; Seitz U
Endoscopy; 2008 Sep; 40(9):739-45. PubMed ID: 18698533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors].
Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Gaa J; Meier-Willersen HJ; Wendl K; Georgi M
Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10370410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for suspected bilio-pancreatic disease: should the endoscopist take a second look?
Wehrmann T; Eckardt AJ; Riphaus A
Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 51(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 23417365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Navigator-triggered isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstructions: comparison with direct cholangiography.
Choi JY; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SH; Lee MW; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 18050328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for locating hepatolithiasis and detecting accompanying biliary strictures.
Park DH; Kim MH; Lee SS; Lee SK; Kim KP; Han JM; Kim SY; Song MH; Seo DW; Kim AY; Kim TK; Min YI
Endoscopy; 2004 Nov; 36(11):987-92. PubMed ID: 15520917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can MRCP replace ERCP?
Takehara Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 8(3):517-34. PubMed ID: 9626864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MRCP in primary sclerosing cholangitis].
Weber C; Krupski G; Lorenzen J; Grotelüschen R; Seitz U; Rogiers X; Adam G
Rofo; 2003 Feb; 175(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 12584620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
