These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9578209)
21. The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: what method for nursing? Carr LT J Adv Nurs; 1994 Oct; 20(4):716-21. PubMed ID: 7822608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative vs qualitative research. Brink H Nurs RSA; 1991 Jan; 6(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 2011171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In response to Porter S. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60 (1), 79-86. Rolfe G J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):108-9. PubMed ID: 17824944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Case study: a bridge across the paradigms. Luck L; Jackson D; Usher K Nurs Inq; 2006 Jun; 13(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 16700753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [How to relate concepts and data]. Angot J; Milano P Rech Soins Infirm; 2005 Mar; (80):12-27. PubMed ID: 15861914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. Foss C; Ellefsen B J Adv Nurs; 2002 Oct; 40(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 12366654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Concept analysis: some limitations and possible solutions. Botes A Curationis; 2002 Aug; 25(3):23-7. PubMed ID: 12434635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Issues to consider when choosing and using large national databases for research of families. Moriarty HJ; Deatrick JA; Mahon MM; Feetham SL; Carroll RM; Shepard MP; Orsi AJ West J Nurs Res; 1999 Apr; 21(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 11512173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. What future for research in mental health nursing: rejoinder to Parsons, Beech and Rolfe. Gournay K; Ritter S J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 9807357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Critiquing research for use in practice. Dale JC J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15867836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Nursing advocacy-a review of the empirical research 1990--2003. Vaartio H; Leino-Kilpi H Int J Nurs Stud; 2005 Aug; 42(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 15982468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Theoretic orientation and body of knowledge. Grant RE Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):427. PubMed ID: 2071438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens. Cutcliffe JR; McKenna HP J Adv Nurs; 1999 Aug; 30(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 10457239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The discussion section of a research report. Connelly LM Medsurg Nurs; 2009; 18(5):300-1. PubMed ID: 19927967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. An application of the mini review to a complex methodological question: how best to research public health nursing and service quality? Hanafin SS; Cowley S; Griffiths P Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Sep; 41(7):799-811. PubMed ID: 15288802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]