163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9578229)
1. The effect of three different recording materials on the reproducibility of condylar guidance registrations in three semi-adjustable articulators.
Gross M; Nemcovsky C; Tabibian Y; Gazit E
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Mar; 25(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 9578229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
Goyal MK; Goyal S
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of condylar settings of three semiadjustable articulators.
Gross M; Nemcovsky C; Friedlander LD
Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 2133380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position.
Utz KH; Müller F; Lückerath W; Fuss E; Koeck B
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 May; 29(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12028494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An
Keerthana SR; Mohammed HS; Hariprasad A; Anand M; Ayesha S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 34810368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.
Palaskar JN; Joshi N; Gullapalli P; Shah P
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Lateral condylar movement: recording and transfer from the physiologic closing path].
Abjean J; Bodin C
Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1989; 18(2):111-27. PubMed ID: 2633266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical comparative study of Cadiax Compact II and intraoral records using wax and addition silicone.
Torabi K; Pour SR; Ahangari AH; Ghodsi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 25390868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of wax interocclusal records on different articulators.
Boulos PJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(6):755-759. PubMed ID: 30589004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation of the ability of computerized axiography to reproduce occlusal contacts.
Franklin P; McLelland R; Brunton P
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 20397498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods for minimizing the errors in mandibular model mounting on an articulator.
Adrien P; Schouver J
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):929-35. PubMed ID: 9467996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of semi-adjustable articulators: reproducibility of sagittal condylar path inclination assessed by a jaw-tracking system with six degrees of freedom.
Hangai K; Aridome K; Wang CH; Igarashi Y
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jul; 52(3):360-5. PubMed ID: 18678969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study.
Tannamala PK; Pulagam M; Pottem SR; Swapna B
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of the Hanau formula in construction of complete dentures.
Javid NS; Porter MR
J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Oct; 34(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 1100807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sagittal condylar guidance as determined by protrusion records and wear facets of teeth.
Donegan SJ; Christensen LV
Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(5):469-72. PubMed ID: 1811642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.
Chang WS; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; Tabacco MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jul; 92(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15232566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproduction ofarticulator settings and movements with an ultrasonic jaw movement recorder.
Baker PJ; Setchell DJ; Tredwin CJ
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16808105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical evaluation of materials for interocclusal registration in centric relation.
Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL; de Mattos MG; Ribeiro RF
Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11213793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
