134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9578859)
1. Effect on attendance at breast cancer screening of adding a self administered questionnaire to the usual invitation to breast screening in southern England.
Banks E; Richardson A; Beral V; Crossley B; Simmonds M; Hilton E; English R; Davis J; Austoker J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Feb; 52(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 9578859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.
Sutton S; Bickler G; Sancho-Aldridge J; Saidi G
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Feb; 48(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 8138773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study.
Hobbs P; Kay C; Friedman EH; St Leger AS; Lambert C; Boggis CR; Howard TM; Owen AW; Asbury DL
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6764):1314-6. PubMed ID: 2271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response of women aged 65-74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, UK.
Horton Taylor D; McPherson K; Parbhoo S; Perry N
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Feb; 50(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8762359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The population-based mammography screening programme in Germany: uptake and first experiences of women in 10 federal states].
Albert US; Kalder M; Schulte H; Klusendick M; Diener J; Schulz-Zehden B; Kopp I; Nass-Griegoleit I
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Feb; 74(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 21229475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The psychological effects of breast screening in terms of patients' perceived health anxieties.
Swanson V; McIntosh IB; Power KG; Dobson H
Br J Clin Pract; 1996; 50(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 8733330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does routine screening for breast cancer raise anxiety? Results from a three wave prospective study in England.
Sutton S; Saidi G; Bickler G; Hunter J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Aug; 49(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 7650466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Routine invitation of women aged 65-69 for breast cancer screening: results of first year of pilot study.
Rubin G; Garvican L; Moss S
BMJ; 1998 Aug; 317(7155):388-9. PubMed ID: 9694755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect on breast cancer screening response in The Netherlands of inviting women for an additional scientific investigation.
Peeters PH; Beckers CG; Hogervorst JM; Collette HJ
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Apr; 48(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 8189174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized controlled trial of mammographic screening from age 40 ('Age' trial): patterns of screening attendance.
Johns LE; Moss SM;
J Med Screen; 2010; 17(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20356944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving uptake in non-attenders of breast screening: selective use of second appointment.
Stead MJ; Wallis MG; Wheaton ME
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 9718524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of issuing an invitation for breast cancer screening to women aged 65 to 69.
Hendry PJ; Entwistle C
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(2):88-9. PubMed ID: 8849767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extending the age range for breast screening in England: pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomization.
Moser K; Sellars S; Wheaton M; Cooke J; Duncan A; Maxwell A; Michell M; Wilson M; Beral V; Peto R; Richards M; Patnick J
J Med Screen; 2011; 18(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 21852703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer screening programme as setting for an adjunct research project: effect on programme attendance.
Gram IT; Lund E
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 18416955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting reattendance to the second round of the Maltese national breast screening programme: an analytical descriptive study.
Marmarà D; Marmarà V; Hubbard G
BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):189. PubMed ID: 30760275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can postal prompts from general practitioners improve the uptake of breast screening? A randomised controlled trial in one east London general practice.
O'Connor AM; Griffiths CJ; Underwood MR; Eldridge S
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 9575461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening.
Curry SJ; Taplin SH; Anderman C; Barlow WE; McBride C
Prev Med; 1993 May; 22(3):350-60. PubMed ID: 8327418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving breast screening uptake: persuading initial non-attenders to attend.
Turner KM; Wilson BJ; Gilbert FJ
J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 8790517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
