65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9579352)
1. A comparison of the evaluation and treatment of cervical dysplasia by gynecologists and nurse practitioners.
Morris DL; McLean CH; Bishop SL; Harlow KC
Nurse Pract; 1998 Apr; 23(4):101-2, 108-10, 113-4. PubMed ID: 9579352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current views and practices in the management of low-grade cervical abnormalities-results of a British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Study.
Moss EL; Jones PW; Finn C; Redman CW; Todd R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 20885152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pap smears collected by nurse practitioners: a comparison with smears collected by medical practitioners.
Mitchell H
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1993 Jun; 20(5):807-10. PubMed ID: 8337173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of physician and nurse practitioner colposcopy to effect improved surveillance of cervical cancer.
Kilic G; England J; Borahay M; Pedraza D; Freeman D; Snyder R; Ertan AK
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 22611960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Who else is providing care in dermatology practices? Trends in the use of nonphysician clinicians.
Resneck JS; Kimball AB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Feb; 58(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 18222319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical polyps in postmenopausal women: is there a difference in risk?
Schnatz PF; Ricci S; O'Sullivan DM
Menopause; 2009; 16(3):524-8. PubMed ID: 19179926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gender differences in rural and urban practice location among mid-level health care providers.
Lindsay S
J Rural Health; 2007; 23(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 17300481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical perception of disease probability associated with Bethesda System diagnoses.
Raab SS; Hart AR; D'Antonio JA; Grzybicki DM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 May; 115(5):681-8. PubMed ID: 11345831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterizing nurse practitioner practice by sampling patient encounters: an APRNet study.
Deshefy-Longhi T; Swartz MK; Grey M
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 May; 20(5):281-7. PubMed ID: 18460169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer screening practices of certified nurse-midwives in the United States.
Murphy PA; Schwarz EB; Dyer JM
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 18164429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient satisfaction of young adults in rural clinics: policy implications for nurse practitioner practice.
Lemley KB; Marks B
Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2009 May; 10(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 19783536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From competence to capability: a study of nurse practitioners in clinical practice.
Gardner A; Hase S; Gardner G; Dunn SV; Carryer J
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jan; 17(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 17419787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance evaluation and patient outcomes monitored by nurse practitioners and certified nurse-midwives in Florida.
Gregg AC; Bloom KC
Clin Excell Nurse Pract; 1999 Sep; 3(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 10763626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment advice in primary care: a comparative study of nurse practitioners and general practitioners.
Seale C; Anderson E; Kinnersley P
J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jun; 54(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 16722950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of specialty on pathology resource use in evaluation of cervical dysplasia.
Shackelford DP; Griffin D; Hoffman MK; Jones DE
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 1):709-12. PubMed ID: 10546715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of patients in the intensive care unit: comparison via work sampling analysis of an acute care nurse practitioner and physicians in training.
Hoffman LA; Tasota FJ; Scharfenberg C; Zullo TG; Donahoe MP
Am J Crit Care; 2003 Sep; 12(5):436-43. PubMed ID: 14503427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cancer screening continues to limit provision of contraception.
Schwarz EB; Saint M; Gildengorin G; Weitz TA; Stewart FH; Sawaya GF
Contraception; 2005 Sep; 72(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 16102551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurse practitioners and managed care: patient satisfaction and intention to adhere to nurse practitioner plan of care.
Hayes E
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2007 Aug; 19(8):418-26. PubMed ID: 17655571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Family nurse practitioners: perceived competencies and recommendations.
Ward MJ
Nurs Res; 1979; 28(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 258801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
