These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9579429)

  • 21. Composite assessment of gestational age: a comparison of institutionally derived and published regression equations.
    Hill LM; Guzick D; Hixson J; Peterson CS; Rivello DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 166(2):551-5. PubMed ID: 1536228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of customized fetal growth charts in twins.
    Ghi T; Prefumo F; Fichera A; Lanna M; Periti E; Persico N; Viora E; Rizzo G;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):514.e1-514.e17. PubMed ID: 28065816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
    Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transverse cerebellar diameter in twin gestations.
    Shimizu T; Gaudette S; Nimrod C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 167(4 Pt 1):1004-8. PubMed ID: 1415384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Serial biparietal diameter and femur length measurements in twin gestations.
    Gilstrap LC; Hankins GD; Collins TL; Pierson W
    Am J Perinatol; 1986 Jul; 3(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 3718638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of intrauterine growth pattern of twins by linear discriminant analysis of the values of biparietal diameter, femur length and abdominal circumference1.
    Farina A; Vesce F; Garutti P; Jorizzo G; Bianciotto A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1999; 48(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10394085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of Z-score distribution for the quality control of fetal ultrasound measurements at 20-24 weeks.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):750-4. PubMed ID: 16308899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
    Dubiel M; Krajewski M; Pietryga M; Tretyn A; Breborowicz G; Lindquist P; Gudmundsson S
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ultrasonographic detection of abnormal fetal growth with the gestational age-independent, transverse cerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference ratio.
    Meyer WJ; Gauthier D; Ramakrishnan V; Sipos J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1057-63. PubMed ID: 7943070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in multiple pregnancies.
    Lynch L; Lapinski R; Alvarez M; Lockwood CJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 6(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 8590207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultrasound in twin pregnancies.
    Morin L; Lim K; ; ; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jun; 33(6):643-656. PubMed ID: 21846456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fetal ultrasound biometry: 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values.
    Kurmanavicius J; Wright EM; Royston P; Zimmermann R; Huch R; Huch A; Wisser J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Feb; 106(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 10426679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 or 15-20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in a population of in-vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan.
    Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Reilly M; Valentin L; Grunewald C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 24(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 15229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry.
    Salim I; Cavallaro A; Ciofolo-Veit C; Rouet L; Raynaud C; Mory B; Collet Billon A; Harrison G; Roundhill D; Papageorghiou AT
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):650-654. PubMed ID: 30478919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sonographic growth curves of triplet conceptions.
    Mordel N; Laufer N; Zajicek G; Shalev Z; Lewin A; Schenker JG; Sadovsky E
    Am J Perinatol; 1993 May; 10(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 8517904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses.
    Nasrat H; Bondagji NS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Feb; 88(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15694104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gestational age in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: comparison between ultrasound measurement and actual age.
    Wennerholm UB; Bergh C; Hagberg H; Sultan B; Wennergren M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 12(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 9793188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intrauterine growth in multiple pregnancies in relation to fetal number, chorionicity and gestational age.
    Papageorghiou AT; Bakoulas V; Sebire NJ; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 32(7):890-3. PubMed ID: 18831073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation in twin pregnancies.
    Danon D; Melamed N; Bardin R; Meizner I
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):759-64. PubMed ID: 18827117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.