These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Cerebellar growth in normal and growth-restricted fetuses of multiple gestations. Goldstein I; Reece EA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1343-8. PubMed ID: 7485351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Estimation of fetal weight in twins: a new mathematical model. Ong S; Smith AP; Fitzmaurice A; Campbell D Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Sep; 106(9):924-8. PubMed ID: 10492103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Individual growth curve standards in triplets: prediction of third-trimester growth and birth characteristics. Hata T; Deter RL; Hill RM Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):379-84. PubMed ID: 1876369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. How accurate is second trimester fetal dating? Hadlock FP; Harrist RB; Martinez-Poyer J J Ultrasound Med; 1991 Oct; 10(10):557-61. PubMed ID: 1942221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population. Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length. Weiner CP; Sabbagha RE; Vaisrub N; Socol ML Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 65(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 3889747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur. Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry. Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comprehensive fetal ultrasonographic growth measurements in triplet gestations. Rodis JF; Arky L; Egan JF; Borgida AF; Leo MV; Campbell WA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1128-32. PubMed ID: 10561631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Chinese fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with charts from other populations. Zhang Y; Meng H; Jiang Y; Xu Z; Ouyang Y; Li S; Chen Q; Wu Q; Li R; Ru T; Cai A; Chen X; Yang T; Chen P; Xie H; Lu H; Dai Q; Dong F; Yang M; Yang X; Lu J; Tian J; Sun K; Li H; J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(9):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 29216774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Fetal size charts for a population from Cali, Colombia: sonographic measurements of biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length. Briceño F; Restrepo H; Paredes R; Cifuentes R J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1215-25. PubMed ID: 23804344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies. Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study. Ambroise Grandjean G; Hossu G; Banasiak C; Ciofolo-Veit C; Raynaud C; Rouet L; Morel O; Beaumont M BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e031777. PubMed ID: 31843832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Khalil A; D'Antonio F; Dias T; Cooper D; Thilaganathan B; Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 44(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 24311473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A prospective longitudinal study of growth in twin gestations compared with growth in singleton pregnancies. II. The fetal limbs. Reece EA; Yarkoni S; Abdalla M; Gabrielli S; Holford T; O'Connor TZ; Bargar M; Hobbins JC J Ultrasound Med; 1991 Aug; 10(8):445-50. PubMed ID: 1942233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Diagnostic accuracy of different ultrasonographic growth parameters in predicting discordancy in twin gestation: a different approach. Shah YG; Sherer DM; Gragg LA; Casaceli CJ; Woods JR Am J Perinatol; 1994 May; 11(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 8048985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]