These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9579473)
1. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Klistorner AI; Graham SL; Grigg JR; Billson FA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 May; 39(6):937-50. PubMed ID: 9579473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Klistorner AI; Graham SL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Aug; 42(9):2145-52. PubMed ID: 11481284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A child with epilepsy in whom multifocal VEPs facilitated the objective measurement of the visual field. Yukawa E; Kim YJ; Kawasaki K; Taketani F; Hara Y Epilepsia; 2005 Apr; 46(4):577-9. PubMed ID: 15816954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Klistorner A; Graham SL Ophthalmology; 2000 Dec; 107(12):2283-99. PubMed ID: 11097611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation of topographic visually evoked potentials across the visual field. Yu MZ; Brown B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 9135809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Innovative evaluation of visual field defects in epileptic patients after standard anterior temporal lobectomy, using partial field visual evoked potentials. Báez Martín MM; del Carmen Pérez Téllez Y; Chacón LM; Díaz BE; Trápaga-Quincoses O; Maeso IG; Bender JE; Galvizu R; García ME; Abreu IC; Rodríguez GS Epilepsy Res; 2010 Jun; 90(1-2):68-74. PubMed ID: 20427151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying human albinism: a comparison of VEP and fMRI. von dem Hagen EA; Hoffmann MB; Morland AB Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):238-49. PubMed ID: 18172098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of multifocal visual evoked potential tests in the objective evaluation of the visual field in pediatric epilepsy surgery. Kim YJ; Yukawa E; Kawasaki K; Nakase H; Sakaki T J Neurosurg; 2006 Mar; 104(3 Suppl):160-5. PubMed ID: 16572632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrode position and the multi-focal visual-evoked potential: role in objective visual field assessment. Klistorner AI; Graham SL; Grigg JR; Billson FA Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26 Suppl 1():S91-4. PubMed ID: 9685035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The detection of small relative simulated field defects using multifocal VEPs. Chan HL; Chu HW; Ng YF; Tam WK; Young SM; Lam CH; Cheung AL Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 May; 25(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 15854069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia. Watanabe K; Shinoda K; Kimura I; Mashima Y; Oguchi Y; Ohde H Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 17184719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Objective evaluation of the visual field defects in a patient with cerebral infarction using multifocal VEPs]. Yukawa E; Saitou K; Kim YJ; Maruoka S; Kanzaki M; Hara Y No To Shinkei; 2006 May; 58(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 16780052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]