These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9579602)

  • 1. Single platform flow cytometric absolute CD34+ cell counts based on the ISHAGE guidelines. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering.
    Keeney M; Chin-Yee I; Weir K; Popma J; Nayar R; Sutherland DR
    Cytometry; 1998 Apr; 34(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 9579602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enumeration of CD34+ cells in cord blood: a variation on a single-platform flow cytometric method based on the ISHAGE gating strategy.
    Brocklebank AM; Sparrow RL
    Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 46(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 11514960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in leukapheresis product and bone marrow for clinical transplantation: a comparison of three methods.
    Gajkowska A; Oldak T; Jastrzewska M; Machaj EK; Walewski J; Kraszewska E; Pojda Z
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2006; 44(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 16584093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two single-platform ISHAGE-based CD34 enumeration protocols on BD FACSCalibur and FACSCanto flow cytometers.
    Sutherland DR; Nayyar R; Acton E; Giftakis A; Dean S; Mosiman VL
    Cytotherapy; 2009; 11(5):595-605. PubMed ID: 19513900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the single-platform ISHAGE method for CD34(+) hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell enumeration in an international multicenter study.
    Gratama JW; Kraan J; Keeney M; Sutherland DR; Granger V; Barnett D
    Cytotherapy; 2003; 5(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 12745591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells for clinical transplantation: comparison of three different methods.
    Venditti A; Battaglia A; Del Poeta G; Buccisano F; Maurillo L; Tamburini A; Del Moro B; Epiceno AM; Martiradonna M; Caravita T; Santinelli S; Adorno G; Picardi A; Zinno F; Lanti A; Bruno A; Suppo G; Franchi A; Franconi G; Amadori S
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Nov; 24(9):1019-27. PubMed ID: 10556963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A single-platform approach using flow cytometry and microbeads to evaluate immune reconstitution in mice after bone marrow transplantation.
    Perruche S; Kleinclauss F; Lienard A; Robinet E; Tiberghien P; Saas P
    J Immunol Methods; 2004 Nov; 294(1-2):53-66. PubMed ID: 15604016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External quality assessment in clinical cell analysis by flow cytometry. Why is it so important?
    Siftar Z; Paro MM; Sokolić I; Nazor A; Mestrić ZF
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 20432753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow cytometric CD34+ stem cell enumeration: lessons from nine years' external quality assessment within the Benelux countries.
    Levering WH; Preijers FW; van Wieringen WN; Kraan J; van Beers WA; Sintnicolaas K; van Rhenen DJ; Gratama JW
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2007 May; 72(3):178-88. PubMed ID: 17397065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of erythrocyte lysing procedures on the recovery of hematopoietic progenitor cells in flow cytometric analysis.
    Greve B; Beller C; Cassens U; Sibrowski W; Göhde W
    Stem Cells; 2006 Mar; 24(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 16210405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single- versus dual-platform assays for human CD34+ cell enumeration.
    Barbosa IL; Sousa ME; Godinho MI; Sousa F; Carvalhais A
    Cytometry; 1999 Dec; 38(6):274-9. PubMed ID: 10589042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ISHAGE protocol: are we doing it correctly?
    Whitby A; Whitby L; Fletcher M; Reilly JT; Sutherland DR; Keeney M; Barnett D
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2012 Jan; 82(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 21915992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of hematopoietic progenitor cell count determined by the SE-automated hematology analyzer with CD34(+) cell count by flow cytometry in leukapheresis products.
    Park KU; Kim SH; Suh C; Kim S; Lee SJ; Park JS; Cho HJ; Kim KW; Lee K; Kim HJ; Park J; Joo Min Y; Kim JG; Kim T; Lee JH; Kim SB; Kim SW; Lee KH; Lee JS; Kim WK; Park CJ; Chi HS
    Am J Hematol; 2001 May; 67(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 11279656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of absolute concentration and viability of CD34+ cells in cord blood and cord blood products using fluorescent beads and cyanine nucleic acid dyes.
    Hübl W; Iturraspe J; Martinez GA; Hutcheson CE; Roberts CG; Fisk DD; Sugrue MW; Wingard JR; Braylan RC
    Cytometry; 1998 Jun; 34(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 9696156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct measurement of CD34+ blood stem cell absolute counts by flow cytometry.
    Fukuda J; Kaneko T; Egashira M; Oshimi K
    Stem Cells; 1998; 16(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 9708452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multicolor, no-lyse no-wash assay for the absolute counting of CD34+ cells by flow cytometry.
    Alvarez-Larran A; Jover L; Marin P; Petriz J
    Cytometry; 2002 Oct; 50(5):249-53. PubMed ID: 12360574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-thaw viable CD34(+) cell count is a valuable predictor of haematopoietic stem cell engraftment in autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.
    Lee S; Kim S; Kim H; Baek EJ; Jin H; Kim J; Kim HO
    Vox Sang; 2008 Feb; 94(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 18028260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cytofluorimetric analysis of CD34 cells.
    Basso G; Timeus F
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Dec; 22 Suppl 5():S17-20. PubMed ID: 9989883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Viable CD34+ stem cell content of a cord blood graft: which measurement performed before transplantation is most representative?
    Van haute I; Lootens N; De Smet S; De Buck C; Verdegem L; Vanheusden K; Pinxteren J; Vandekerckhove B
    Transfusion; 2004 Apr; 44(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 15043571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A flow cytometric method for determination of absolute counts of myeloid precursor dendritic cells in peripheral blood.
    Ma L; Scheers W; Vandenberghe P
    J Immunol Methods; 2004 Feb; 285(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 14980435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.