These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9580242)

  • 1. Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length.
    Almenar García A; Forner Navarro L; Ubet Castelló V; Miñana Laliga R
    J Endod; 1997 Jun; 23(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 9580242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics.
    Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography.
    Mentes A; Gencoglu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 11805781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working length in root canal fillings.
    Pagan JC; Santa CA; Alvarez JA
    N Y State Dent J; 1993 Nov; 59(9):41-3. PubMed ID: 8247456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length.
    Kal BI; Baksi BG; Dündar N; Sen BH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17234548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination.
    Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements.
    de Oliveira ML; Pinto GC; Ambrosano GM; Tosoni GM
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gray scale inversion in digital image for measurement of tooth length.
    Oliveira ML; Vieira ML; Cruz AD; Bóscolo FN; DE Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 23338264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ex vivo investigation on the postoperative integrity of the apical constriction after the sole use of electronic working length determination.
    Wolgin M; Grundmann MJ; Tchorz JP; Frank W; Kielbassa AM
    J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():52-57. PubMed ID: 28642058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD
    J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Location and angulation of curvatures of mesiobucal canals of mandibular molars debrided by three endodontic techniques.
    Constante IG; Davidowicz H; Barletta FB; Moura AA
    Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 17384851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study.
    Kishor KM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):550-3. PubMed ID: 23151708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
    Burger CL; Mork TO; Hutter JW; Nicoll B
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 10425952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
    Oliveira ML; Ambrosano GM; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Tosoni GM
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proportional length determination: mathematical method.
    Pink FE; Sachs E
    Gen Dent; 1994; 42(5):428-31; quiz 433-4. PubMed ID: 7489875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary tooth length determination in direct digital radiography: an in vivo study.
    Santos-Pinto L; Cordeiro Rde C; Zuanon AC; Basso MD; Gonçalves MA
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(6):470-4. PubMed ID: 18254416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths.
    Pratten DH; McDonald NJ
    J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 8935014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Methods for the measurement of tooth length and root canal length in endodontic treatment].
    Bołtacz-Rzepkowska E
    Czas Stomatol; 1984 Jul; 37(7):487-90. PubMed ID: 6598114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.