BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9580409)

  • 1. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part IV. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated implants.
    Quiñones CR; Hürzeler MB; Schüpbach P; Arnold DR; Strub JR; Caffesse RG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 9580409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and osseointegrated dental implants in monkeys. Part II. Evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite as a grafting material.
    Quiñones CR; Hürzeler MB; Schüpbach P; Kirsch A; Blum P; Caffesse RG; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 9580408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix.
    Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kirsch A; Gloker C; Schüpbach P; Strub JR; Caffesse RG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):476-86. PubMed ID: 9580407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part III. Evaluation of autogenous bone combined with porous hydroxyapatite.
    Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kirsch A; Schüpbach P; Krausse A; Strub JR; Caffesse RG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Oct; 8(5):401-11. PubMed ID: 9612145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
    Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.
    Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
    Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings.
    Cordioli G; Mazzocco C; Schepers E; Brugnolo E; Majzoub Z
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 11359485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
    Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonceramic hydroxyapatite bone derivative in sinus augmentation procedures: clinical and histomorphometric observations in 10 consecutive cases.
    Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Dayan D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Aug; 23(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 12956482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases.
    Karabuda C; Ozdemir O; Tosun T; Anil A; Olgaç V
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report.
    Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
    Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bovine-HA spongiosa blocks and immediate implant placement in sinus augmentation procedures. Histopathological and histomorphometric observations on different histological stainings in 10 consecutive patients.
    Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Dayan D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 12175380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
    Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study.
    Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants.
    Haas R; Baron M; Zechner W; Mailath-Pokorny G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):691-6. PubMed ID: 14579957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite-bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: a comparative study in humans.
    Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Tal H; Dayan D
    J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):911-20. PubMed ID: 11495140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Report of a human autopsy case in maxillary sinuses augmented using a synthetic bone substitute: Micro-computed tomographic and histologic observations.
    Lee JS; Cha JK; Thoma DS; Jung UW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):339-345. PubMed ID: 29349884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.