260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9581404)
1. Description and evaluation of a simplified method to achieve passive fit between cast titanium frameworks and implants.
Helldén LB; Dérand T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 9581404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous law: a 5-year prospective multicenter study.
Jemt T; Henry P; Lindén B; Naert I; Weber H; Wendelhag I
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 12956498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simplified method to assess precision of fit between framework and supporting implants: a preliminary study.
Calderini A; Maiorana C; Garlini G; Abbondanza T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 17974120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of the fit of 3-unit implant-supported frameworks cast in nickel-chromium and cobalt-chromium alloys and commercially pure titanium after casting, laser welding, and simulated porcelain firings.
Tiossi R; Rodrigues RC; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 18546764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible.
Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T; Jälevik T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 12737254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of interface relationships between implant components for laser-welded titanium frameworks and standard cast frameworks.
Rubenstein JE; Ma T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):491-5. PubMed ID: 10453662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method aimed at achieving passive fit in implant prostheses: case report.
Iglesia MA; Moreno J
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 12066705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The three-dimensional casting distortion of five implant-supported frameworks.
Mitha T; Owen CP; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 19548406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Cresco Bridge and implant concept: presentation of a technology for fabrication of abutment-free, passively fitting superstructures.
Helldén LB; Ericson G; Olsson CO
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Feb; 25(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 15736782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the fit of implant-supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique.
Eisenmann E; Mokabberi A; Walter MH; Freesmeyer WB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):810-8. PubMed ID: 15623055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous maxilla: a 2-year prospective multicenter study.
Jemt T; Bergendal B; Arvidsson K; Bergendal T; Karlsson U; Linden B; Palmqvist S; Rundcrantz T; Bergström C
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(6):551-7. PubMed ID: 10023217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
Takahashi T; Gunne J
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified section method for laser-welding of ill-fitting cp Ti and Ni-Cr alloy one-piece cast implant-supported frameworks.
Tiossi R; Falcão-Filho H; Aguiar Júnior FA; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 20149062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures.
Koke U; Wolf A; Lenz P; Gilde H
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15140174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
