These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9582390)

  • 1. Canadian Innovations in Siting Hazardous Waste Management Facilities.
    Kuhn RG; Ballard KR
    Environ Manage; 1998 Jul; 22(4):533-45. PubMed ID: 9582390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When siting works, Canada-style.
    Rabe BG
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):119-42. PubMed ID: 1619246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public-private partnerships in the siting of hazardous waste facilities: the importance of trust.
    Ibitayo OO
    Waste Manag Res; 2002 Jun; 20(3):212-22. PubMed ID: 12152889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PROFILE: Multiattribute Utility Analysis as a Framework for Public Participation in Siting a Hazardous Waste Management Facility.
    Merkhofer MW; Conway R; Anderson RG
    Environ Manage; 1997 Nov; 21(6):831-9. PubMed ID: 9336482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2225-38. PubMed ID: 25002369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The hazardous waste facility siting controversy: the Massachusetts experience.
    Am J Law Med; 1987; 12(1):131-56. PubMed ID: 3661576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. System tradeoffs in siting a solar photovoltaic material recovery infrastructure.
    Goe M; Gaustad G; Tomaszewski B
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 160():154-66. PubMed ID: 26144560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental risk perception and well-being: effects of the landfill siting process in two southern Ontario communities.
    Wakefield S; Elliott SJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2000 Apr; 50(7-8):1139-54. PubMed ID: 10714933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The voluntary siting process, a case study in New Jersey.
    Stencel JR; Lee KY
    Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2 Suppl):S57-63. PubMed ID: 14744073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Siting landfills and incinerators in areas of historic unpopularity: surveying the views of the next generation.
    Feo GD; Williams ID
    Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2798-810. PubMed ID: 24054780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compensation and negotiation in the siting of hazardous-waste facilities.
    Kleindorfer PR
    Sci Total Environ; 1986 May; 51():197-208. PubMed ID: 3738492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Thermovalorization: new technologies, impacts and mitigation strategies].
    Buffoli M; Capolongo S; Loconte VL; Signorelli C
    Ann Ig; 2012; 24(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 22755503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. School Siting Near Industrial Chemical Facilities: Findings from the U.S. Chemical Safety Board's Investigation of the West Fertilizer Explosion.
    Tinney VA; Denton JM; Sciallo-Tyler L; Paulson JA
    Environ Health Perspect; 2016 Oct; 124(10):1493-1496. PubMed ID: 27483496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An estimation of the social costs of landfill siting using a choice experiment.
    Sasao T
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(8):753-62. PubMed ID: 15381227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Residents' concerns and attitudes toward solid waste management facilities in Palestine: a case study of Hebron district.
    Al-Khatib IA; Ajlouny H; Al-Sari' MI; Kontogianni S
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Mar; 32(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 24522776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resolving public conflict in site selection process-a risk communication approach.
    Ishizaka K; Tanaka M
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(5):385-96. PubMed ID: 12893010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating multi-criteria techniques with geographical information systems in waste facility location to enhance public participation.
    Higgs G
    Waste Manag Res; 2006 Apr; 24(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 16634225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Siting and routing assessment for solid waste management under uncertainty using the grey mini-max regret criterion.
    Chang NB; Davila E
    Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 38(4):654-72. PubMed ID: 16941079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A conceptual framework for negotiating public involvement in municipal waste management decision-making in the UK.
    Garnett K; Cooper T; Longhurst P; Jude S; Tyrrel S
    Waste Manag; 2017 Aug; 66():210-221. PubMed ID: 28416084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.