257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9582469)
1. Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Brokenshire MK; Say PJ; van Vonno AH; Wong C
Genitourin Med; 1997 Dec; 73(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 9582469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
Chan SW
Pathology; 1993 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 8316503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in male urethral swabs and urines with a microparticle enzyme immunoassay.
Chernesky MA; Jang D; Sellors J; Coleman P; Bodner J; Hrusovsky I; Chong S; Mahony JB
Sex Transm Dis; 1995; 22(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 7709326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a novel technique applied to direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.
Pugh SF; Slack RC; Caul EO; Paul ID; Appleton PN; Gatley S
J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 38(10):1139-41. PubMed ID: 3902899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Syva's enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
Moncada J; Schachter J; Bolan G; Nathan J; Shafer MA; Clark A; Schwebke J; Stamm W; Mroczkowski T; Seliborska Z
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 1478048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.
Hay PE; Thomas BJ; Horner PJ; MacLeod E; Renton AM; Taylor-Robinson D
Genitourin Med; 1994 Apr; 70(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8206484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative evaluation of various direct and culture methods for the diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections].
Martelli P; Crovatto M; Gava G; Chiaradia V; Santini G
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1986 Mar; 22(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 3538126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF
Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.
Lefebvre J; Laperrière H; Rousseau H; Massé R
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal specimens from female commercial sex workers using a new improved enzyme immunoassay.
Tanaka M; Nakayama H; Yoshida H; Takahashi K; Nagafuji T; Hagiwara T; Kumazawa J
Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Dec; 74(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 10195054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of urine-based screening strategies to detect Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active asymptomatic young males.
Shafer MA; Schachter J; Moncada J; Keogh J; Pantell R; Gourlay L; Eyre S; Boyer CB
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(17):2065-70. PubMed ID: 8411573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending urban midwestern family planning and community health clinics: risk factors, selective screening, and evaluation of non-culture techniques.
Addiss DG; Vaughn ML; Golubjatnikov R; Pfister J; Kurtycz DF; Davis JP
Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 2247804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
Ridgway GL; Mumtaz G; Robinson AJ; Franchini M; Carder C; Burczak J; Lee H
J Clin Pathol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 8655675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme combined with Chlamydia Blocking Reagent verification.
Zeeberg B; Thelin I; Schalén C
Int J STD AIDS; 1992; 3(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 1391063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from men and women as an alternative to swabs.
Tchoudomirova K; Tchapanova A; Nouchov F
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1997; 39(4):30-6. PubMed ID: 9575647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. False-positive enzyme immunoassay test results for Chlamydia trachomatis because of contact of the collection swab with agar.
Sales V; Miller MA; Libman M
Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Sep; 25(8):418-20. PubMed ID: 9773434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G
Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
