These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9582626)

  • 21. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Pulpal and dentinal responses to glass ionomer cement].
    Miani C; Sacchi A; Boari A
    Minerva Stomatol; 1984; 33(4):677-81. PubMed ID: 6593587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pulpal responses following direct pulp capping of healthy dog teeth with dentine adhesive systems.
    Koliniotou-Koumpia E; Tziafas D
    J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):639-47. PubMed ID: 16139695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reactionary dentinogenesis after applying restorative materials and bioactive dentin matrix molecules as liners in deep cavities prepared in nonhuman primate teeth.
    Duque C; Hebling J; Smith AJ; Giro EM; Oliveira MF; de Souza Costa CA
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):452-61. PubMed ID: 16671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a dentin barrier test by cyctotoxicity testing of various dental cements.
    Schmalz G; Schweikl H; Esch J; Hiller KA
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):112-5. PubMed ID: 8618090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pulpal inflammatory responses following non-carious class V restorations.
    About I; Murray PE; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 11504432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cements using mouse lymphoma cells in vitro.
    Ribeiro DA; Marques ME; Salvadori DM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):912-7. PubMed ID: 17168933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth.
    Mousavinasab M; Namazikhah MS; Sarabi N; Jajarm HH; Bidar M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Jan; 36(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18293762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Histopathological study of dental pulp tissue capped with enamel matrix derivative.
    Ishizaki NT; Matsumoto K; Kimura Y; Wang X; Yamashita A
    J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 12669875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pulpal responses to two luting cements.
    Valcke CF; Cleaton-Jones PE; Austin JC; Forbes M; Sam C
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1982 Dec; 37(12):858-62. PubMed ID: 6964197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Pulp tolerance of glass-ionomer and zinc oxide-phosphate cements].
    Schmalz G; Schmalz C; Rotgans J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1986 Sep; 41(9):806-12. PubMed ID: 3465519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Monkey pulpal response to an MMA-based resin cement as adhesive luting for indirect restorations.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Uzzaman MA; Sattabanasuk V; Sasafuchi Y; Foxton RM; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 16240967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Biological testing of the glass-ionomer cement, Ketac-Fil under conditions of use].
    Beer R
    ZWR; 1991 Oct; 100(10):756-60. PubMed ID: 1840230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pulpal response to a glass-ionomer cement. Histological study in dogs.
    Holland Junior C; Takayama S; Russo M; Komatsu J; Sasaki T; Quintella LP
    Rev Fac Odontol Aracatuba; 1978; 7(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 297972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct pulp capping with a self-etching adhesive system: histopathologic evaluation in dogs' teeth.
    da Silva LA; de Freitas AC; de Carvalho FK; de Queiroz AM; Nelson-Filho P; Porto-Neto ST
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e34-40. PubMed ID: 19540442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vivo study of the pulp reaction to Fuji IX, a glass ionomer cement.
    Six N; Lasfargues JJ; Goldberg M
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 10856806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of different reinforced glass ionomer restorative cement on vital tooth structure.
    Kinawi NA
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1479-84. PubMed ID: 9497700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.