These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9582639)

  • 21. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
    Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Cephalometric study of the effect of orthodontic treatment on the mandible in Class II, Division 1 patients].
    Atta JY; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2135330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Case report: non-extraction treatment with functional and mechanical therapy of a Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Murakami T; Moro N; Abe K
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Mar; 14(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 9528407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treatment outcome in angle class II, division 1 patients in pre-puberty and puberty after jumping-the-bite appliance.
    Wedler S; Tränkmann J; Lisson JA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Mar; 67(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 16570132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention.
    Sadowsky C; Schneider BJ; BeGole EA; Tahir E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 8074088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cephalometric evaluation of the eruption guidance appliance in Class II, division 1 treatment.
    Janson GR; Pereira AC; Bergersen EO; Henriques JF; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR
    J Clin Orthod; 1997 May; 31(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 9511561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Change of mandibular position during two-phase orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II in the Chinese population.
    Cheung RN; Hägg U; Wong RW; Liao C; Yang Y
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():804831. PubMed ID: 25695103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Part 2.
    Arvystas MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Jan; 99(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 1986530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Asymmetric extraction treatment of an Angle Class II Division 2 subdivision left malocclusion with anterior and posterior crossbites.
    Shelley A; Beam W; Mergen J; Parks CT; Casko J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):462-6. PubMed ID: 11029744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Treatment of Class II, div. 1 malocclusion with the activator and with the Begg technique.
    Weichbrodt L; Ingervall B
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1992; 102(9):1037-45. PubMed ID: 1455203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes.
    Rathod AB; Araujo E; Vaden JL; Behrents RG; Oliver DR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 25919105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.