These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9582639)

  • 41. Predictors for Class II treatment duration.
    Popowich K; Nebbe B; Heo G; Glover KE; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15775943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Early treatment of a severe Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Taner-Sarisoy L
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10023229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cephalometric evaluation of symmetric and asymmetric extraction treatment for patients with Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson G; Carvalho PE; Cançado RH; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17628247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Reddy P; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11113799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparison of Twin Block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    Funct Orthod; 1992; 9(4):26-31. PubMed ID: 1452055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Orthodontists' perceptions of the impact of phase 1 treatment for Class II malocclusion on phase 2 needs.
    King GJ; Wheeler TT; McGorray SP; Aiosa LS; Bloom RM; Taylor MG
    J Dent Res; 1999 Nov; 78(11):1745-53. PubMed ID: 10576171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [A critical analysis of the SNA, SNB and ANB angles in assessing orthodontic treatments].
    Pancherz H; Sack B
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1990 Oct; 51(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 2262185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cephalometric appraisal of patients treated with fixed lingual orthodontic appliances: historic review and analysis of cases.
    Fulmer DT; Kuftinec MM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jun; 95(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 2658547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The provision of orthodontic care in the general dental services of England and Wales: extraction patterns, treatment duration, appliance types and standards.
    Richmond S; Andrews M; Roberts CT
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Nov; 20(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 8286304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Hard and soft tissue changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients].
    Zhao MY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1993 Jul; 28(4):240-2. PubMed ID: 8174411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Cephalometric comparison of hard-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases].
    Xu T; Liu Y; Huang W; Lin J
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2003 Dec; 35(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 14710265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. 2014 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: results and trends.
    Keim RG; Gottlieb EL; Vogels DS; Vogels PB
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Oct; 48(10):607-30. PubMed ID: 25416338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases].
    Xu TM; Liu Y; Huang W; Lin JX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Dec; 36(6):650-4. PubMed ID: 15605103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An inference modeling of human visual judgment of sagittal jaw-base relationships based on cephalometry: part I.
    Takada K; Sorihashi Y; Stephens CD; Itoh S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):140-6; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 10672213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiographic examinations of orthodontic educators and practitioners.
    Atchison KA
    J Dent Educ; 1986 Nov; 50(11):651-5. PubMed ID: 3464630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An international comparison of early treatment of angle Class-II/1 cases. Skeletal effects of the first phase of a prospective clinical trial.
    Ehmer U; Tulloch CJ; Proffit WR; Phillips C
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(6):392-408. PubMed ID: 10605275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of facial soft tissue parameters for Palestinians using Holdaway analysis.
    Hussein E; Khateeb SA; Watted N; Aksoy A; Acar A; Abu Mowais M
    Saudi Dent J; 2011 Oct; 23(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 23960515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.