BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9582640)

  • 1. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance.
    Biren S; Erverdi N
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1993 Sep; 1(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 9582640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition.
    Kajiyama K; Murakami T; Suzuki A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 11094369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of the functional regulator III on profile changes in subjects with maxillary deficiency.
    Kilic N; Celikoglu M; Oktay H
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 20453006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 11029736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term and long-term treatment outcomes with the FR-3 appliance of Fränkel.
    Levin AS; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T; Fränkel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):513-24. PubMed ID: 18929269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of tongue appliance on the maxilla in Class III malocclusion due to maxillary deficiency.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009; 20(3):11-4. PubMed ID: 19835181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of Class III malocclusion with the horseshoe appliance: case reports in growing patients.
    Yang KH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 22(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9643195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients.
    Arman A; Ufuk Toygar T; Abuhijleh E
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16731542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype.
    Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive value of molar bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment outcomes.
    Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 21411476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study.
    Saadia M; Torres E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):669-80. PubMed ID: 10842110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of the Fränkel's function regulator on the Class III malocclusion.
    Ulgen M; Firatli S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 8198080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of face mask therapy with and without rapid maxillary expansion in adolescent patients.
    Yavuz I; Halicioğlu K; Ceylan I; Dağsuyu IM; Erdem A
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 22866596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.