These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9582640)

  • 21. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion.
    Mouakeh M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):640-9. PubMed ID: 11395709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dental arch and cephalometric changes following treatment for class III malocclusion by means of the function regulator (FR-3) appliance.
    Kalavritinos M; Papadopoulos MA; Nasiopoulos A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Mar; 66(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 15827701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cephalometric evaluation of the therapeutic effects of the Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II. Div I. malocclusion.
    Küçükkeleş N; Sandalli T
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1992 Sep; 1(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 1308783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of a magnetic appliance in functional Class III patients.
    Tuncer C; Uner O
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 16279823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
    de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The Bimler method in the treatment of sagittal shift of the skeletal base in Class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Barthelemy I; Aussenac J; Barthelemy R; Cadenat H; Boutault F; Fabie M
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1998 Nov; 99(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10088186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Orthodontic intervention in the early mixed dentition: a prospective, controlled study on the effects of the eruption guidance appliance.
    Keski-Nisula K; Hernesniemi R; Heiskanen M; Keski-Nisula L; Varrela J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):254-60; quiz 328.e2. PubMed ID: 18249292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frankel appliance type III: correct fabrication and case report of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Yang KH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 20(4):281-92. PubMed ID: 9151620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The functional regulators (FR III, FR IV)].
    Işiksal E; Seçkin O
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 2101654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A cephalometric comparison of mandibular headgear and chin-cap appliances in orthodontic and orthopaedic view points.
    Arun T; Erverdi N
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1994 Sep; 2(1):392-8. PubMed ID: 9582620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes.
    Sharma AA; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prospective study of the treatment effects of a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup therapy in anterior open-bite patients.
    Pedrin F; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Torres F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 16527639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A long-term evaluation of the mandibular Schwarz appliance and the acrylic splint expander in early mixed dentition patients.
    O'Grady PW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 16905065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Preliminary study of non-surgical treatment of severe Class III malocclusion in 18 patients of 12-20 years old].
    Lin JX; Gu Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15061874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.