These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9582642)

  • 1. Distribution of class I and class II amalgam restorations in Benin City--Nigeria.
    Ufomata D
    Odontostomatol Trop; 1994 Sep; 17(67):4-6. PubMed ID: 9582642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors associated with amalgam restorations in Taiwan.
    Hu SW; Yang LC; Chang HY
    Br Dent J; 2002 Oct; 193(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 12420015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 4-year clinical evaluation of extensive amalgam restorations--description of the failures.
    Plasmans PJ; van 't Hof MA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Nov; 20(6):561-70. PubMed ID: 10412478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 15-year evaluation of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Gruythuysen RJ; Kreulen CM; Tobi H; van Amerongen E; Akerboom HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1996 Jun; 24(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 8871021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National oral health survey Zimbabwe 1995: quality of restorations.
    Frencken JE; Sithole WD
    SADJ; 1998 Sep; 53(8):435-8. PubMed ID: 10518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term cost of direct Class II molar restorations.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(3):107-14. PubMed ID: 12425224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next?
    Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Oral and dental health of a population of school children from the Zou region of Benin (1998)].
    Moalic é ; Zérilli A; Capo-Chichi S; Apovi G
    Sante; 1999; 9(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 10657768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.