These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9582681)

  • 21. Changes in natural head position after orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III patients.
    Cho D; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 26038079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Skull thickness in patients with skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions.
    Arntsen T; Kjaer I; Sonnesen L
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18950320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study.
    Baccetti T; Antonini A; Franchi L; Tonti M; Tollaro I
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 9088604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effect of the cranial radius on the vertical occlusion dimension].
    Matysiak M
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1984 Apr; 27(2):133-53. PubMed ID: 6587921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can cephalometric indices and subjective evaluation be consistent for facial asymmetry?
    Masuoka N; Momoi Y; Ariji Y; Nawa H; Muramatsu A; Goto S; Ariji E
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 16097236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
    Abu Allhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of single- or double-jaw surgery on vertical dimension in skeletal Class III patients.
    Enacar A; Taner T; Manav O
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11563393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.
    Prawat JS; Nieberg L; Cisneros GJ; Acs G
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 7486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A lateral cephalometric x-ray study of selected vertical dimensions in children with atypical deglutition.
    Machado AJ; Crespo AN
    Int J Orofacial Myology; 2010 Nov; 36():17-26. PubMed ID: 23362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A cephalometric study of children with chronic perennial allergic rhinitis.
    Stein E; Flax SJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Dec; 51(12):794-801. PubMed ID: 9462040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusions.
    Polat OO; Kaya B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 17973688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relative position of porion and tragus in orthodontic patients.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Anderbegani A; Poggio CE; Dalloca LL
    Clin Anat; 1995; 8(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 8535968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dento-skeletal components of class II malocclusions for children with normal and retruded mandibles.
    Sarhan OA; Hashim HA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 8054298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A longitudinal cephalometric study of transverse and vertical craniofacial growth.
    Snodell SF; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Nov; 104(5):471-83. PubMed ID: 8237899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.
    Cha KS
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillomandibular relationships in patients wearing complete dentures: a pilot study.
    Ciftçi Y; Kocadereli I; Canay S; Senyilmaz P
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):821-5. PubMed ID: 16279829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.