These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9583306)

  • 1. The effect of backrest angles on discomfort caused by fore-and-aft back vibration.
    Kato K; Hanai T
    Ind Health; 1998 Apr; 36(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 9583306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency weightings for fore-and-aft vibration at the back: effect of contact location, contact area, and body posture.
    Morioka M; Griffin MJ
    Ind Health; 2010; 48(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 20953071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The vibration of inclined backrests: perception and discomfort of vibration applied parallel to the back in the z-axis of the body.
    Basri B; Griffin MJ
    Ergonomics; 2011 Dec; 54(12):1214-27. PubMed ID: 22103729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting discomfort from whole-body vertical vibration when sitting with an inclined backrest.
    Basri B; Griffin MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2013 May; 44(3):423-34. PubMed ID: 23190680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of back support conditions on the apparent mass of seated occupants under horizontal vibration.
    Mandapuram SC; Rakheja S; Shiping MA; Demont RG; Boileau PE
    Ind Health; 2005 Jul; 43(3):421-35. PubMed ID: 16100919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equivalent comfort contours for vertical seat vibration: effect of vibration magnitude and backrest inclination.
    Basri B; Griffin MJ
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(8):909-22. PubMed ID: 22533797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biodynamic response of the seated human body to single-axis and dual-axis vibration: effect of backrest and non-linearity.
    Qiu Y; Griffin MJ
    Ind Health; 2012; 50(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 22146145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the thickness of polyurethane foams at the seat pan and the backrest on fore-and-aft in-line and vertical cross-axis seat transmissibility when sitting with various contact conditions of backrest during fore-and-aft vibration.
    Zhang X; Zhang Q; Li Y; Liu C; Qiu Y
    Appl Ergon; 2021 May; 93():103354. PubMed ID: 33516943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Energy absorption of seated occupants exposed to horizontal vibration and role of back support condition.
    Rakheja S; Mandapuram S; Dong RG
    Ind Health; 2008 Dec; 46(6):550-66. PubMed ID: 19088407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The application of SEAT values for predicting how compliant seats with backrests influence vibration discomfort.
    Basri B; Griffin MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1461-74. PubMed ID: 24793821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discomfort of seated persons exposed to low frequency lateral and roll oscillation: Effect of backrest height.
    Beard GF; Griffin MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():51-61. PubMed ID: 26851464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of backrest inclination based on biodynamic response study for prevention of low back pain.
    Shibata N; Maeda S
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jul; 32(6):577-83. PubMed ID: 20299270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalent comfort contours for fore-and-aft, lateral, and vertical whole-body vibration in the frequency range 1.0 to 10 Hz.
    Arnold JJ; Griffin MJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Nov; 61(11):1545-1559. PubMed ID: 30458682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of seat backrest angle on human performance during whole-body vibration.
    Paddan GS; Holmes SR; Mansfield NJ; Hutchinson H; Arrowsmith CI; King SK; Jones RJ; Rimell AN
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 22176489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apparent mass and seat-to-head transmissibility responses of seated occupants under single and dual axis horizontal vibration.
    Mandapuram S; Rakheja S; Boileau PÉ; Maeda S; Shibata N
    Ind Health; 2010; 48(5):698-714. PubMed ID: 20953086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biodynamic responses of the seated human body to single-axis and dual-axis vibration.
    Qiu Y; Griffin MJ
    Ind Health; 2010; 48(5):615-27. PubMed ID: 20953078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discomfort during lateral acceleration: influence of seat cushion and backrest.
    Beard GF; Griffin MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jul; 44(4):588-94. PubMed ID: 23312371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic interaction between the human body and the seat during vertical vibration: effect of inclination of the seat pan and the backrest on seat transmissibilities.
    Zhang X; Yu P; Li Y; Qiu Y; Sun C; Wang Z; Liu C
    Ergonomics; 2022 May; 65(5):691-703. PubMed ID: 34544317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element modelling of human-seat interactions: vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass when sitting on a rigid seat without backrest and exposed to vertical vibration.
    Liu C; Qiu Y; Griffin MJ
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(7):1207-19. PubMed ID: 25716324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The vibration discomfort of standing people: relative importance of fore-and-aft, lateral, and vertical vibration.
    Thuong O; Griffin MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Sep; 43(5):902-8. PubMed ID: 22305106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.