These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9583479)

  • 21. Patterns of flap loss related to arterial and venous insufficiency in the rat pedicled TRAM flap.
    Qiao Q; Moon W; Zhang F; Chen SG; Kunda L; Lineaweaver WC; Buncke HJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Aug; 43(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 10454324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Chang DW; Reece GP; Wang B; Robb GL; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jun; 105(7):2374-80. PubMed ID: 10845289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of TRAM and DIEP flap physiology in a rat model.
    Hallock GG; Rice DC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1179-84. PubMed ID: 15457031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast reconstruction using tissue expander and TRAM flap with vascular enhancement procedures.
    Kajikawa A; Ueda K; Tateshita T; Katsuragi Y
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Sep; 62(9):1148-53. PubMed ID: 18619933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is it possible to increase the survival of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap following previous abdominoplasty using a delay procedure? An experimental study in the rat.
    Ozkan O; Coskunfirat OK; Ozgentas HE; Yildirim I; Dikici MB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Dec; 116(7):1945-52. PubMed ID: 16327608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
    Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. TRAM flap vascular delay for high-risk breast reconstruction.
    Codner MA; Bostwick J; Nahai F; Bried JT; Eaves FF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Dec; 96(7):1615-22. PubMed ID: 7480281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
    Chang DW; Wang B; Robb GL; Reece GP; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Apr; 105(5):1640-8. PubMed ID: 10809092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Free perforator crossover TRAM flap for breast reconstruction.
    Lam TC; Sellars GD
    Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Feb; 50(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 12567047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The increase in TRAM flap survival after delay does not diminish long term.
    Morrissey WM; Hallock GG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2000 May; 44(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 10805296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of two different delay procedures in a rat skin flap model.
    Yang D; Morris SF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Oct; 102(5):1591-7. PubMed ID: 9774015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates.
    Ng RL; Youssef A; Kronowitz SJ; Lipa JE; Potochny J; Reece GP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):374-84; discussion 385-8. PubMed ID: 15277802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
    Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Timing, magnitude, and utility of surgical delay in the TRAM flap: I. Animal studies.
    Restifo RJ; Ahmed SS; Isenberg JS; Thomson JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Apr; 99(5):1211-6. PubMed ID: 9105347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence for the efficacy of TRAM flap delay in a rat model.
    Hallock GG; Rice DC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Nov; 96(6):1351-7. PubMed ID: 7480233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Effects of surgical delay procedure on the survival of perforator flap with three angiosomes in rat and lits mechanism].
    Li J; Gao Z; Gao W; Li Z
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 30(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 25429814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing various surgical delay methods with ischemic preconditioning in the rat TRAM flap model.
    Cinpolat A; Bektas G; Coskunfirat N; Rizvanovic Z; Coskunfirat OK
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2014 Jun; 30(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 24347333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of the delay phenomenon in the rat single-perforator-based abdominal skin flap model.
    Coşkunfirat OK; Okşar HS; Ozgentaş HE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2000 Jul; 45(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 10917097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Augmented SIEA flap for microvascular breast reconstruction after prior ligation of bilateral deep inferior epigastric arteries.
    Hadad I; Ibrahim AM; Lin SJ; Lee BT
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):845-7. PubMed ID: 23047181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.