186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9583550)
1. Propofol-based versus fentanyl-isoflurane-based anesthesia for cardiac surgery.
Engoren MC; Kraras C; Garzia F
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1998 Apr; 12(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 9583550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens.
Suttner S; Boldt J; Schmidt C; Piper S; Kumle B
Anesth Analg; 1999 Jan; 88(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 9895070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Cheng DC; Karski J; Peniston C; Asokumar B; Raveendran G; Carroll J; Nierenberg H; Roger S; Mickle D; Tong J; Zelovitsky J; David T; Sandler A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Sep; 112(3):755-64. PubMed ID: 8800165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics of spinal versus general anesthesia in elderly patients.
Fredman B; Zohar E; Philipov A; Olsfanger D; Shalev M; Jedeikin R
J Clin Anesth; 1998 Dec; 10(8):623-30. PubMed ID: 9873961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy and resource utilization of remifentanil and fentanyl in fast-track coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective randomized, double-blinded controlled, multi-center trial.
Cheng DC; Newman MF; Duke P; Wong DT; Finegan B; Howie M; Fitch J; Bowdle TA; Hogue C; Hillel Z; Pierce E; Bukenya D
Anesth Analg; 2001 May; 92(5):1094-102. PubMed ID: 11323328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the recovery from isoflurane anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy.
Tsai HJ; Tsou KF; Liu HT; Chu CC; Tsao CM; Tsou MY; Tsai SK
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 2003 Dec; 41(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 14768515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extubation time, hemodynamic stability, and postoperative pain control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: an evaluation of fentanyl, remifentanil, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with propofol for perioperative and postoperative management.
Maddali MM; Kurian E; Fahr J
J Clin Anesth; 2006 Dec; 18(8):605-10. PubMed ID: 17175431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Propofol-based anesthesia as compared with standard anesthetic techniques for middle ear surgery.
Jellish WS; Leonetti JP; Murdoch JR; Fowles S
J Clin Anesth; 1995 Jun; 7(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 7546755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time to tracheal extubation after coronary artery surgery with isoflurane, sevoflurane, or target-controlled propofol anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Parker FC; Story DA; Poustie S; Liu G; McNicol L
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2004 Oct; 18(5):613-9. PubMed ID: 15578473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Planning for early emergence in neurosurgical patients: a randomized prospective trial of low-dose anesthetics.
Bhagat H; Dash HH; Bithal PK; Chouhan RS; Pandia MP
Anesth Analg; 2008 Oct; 107(4):1348-55. PubMed ID: 18806051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of isoflurane versus fentanyl as primary anesthetics for mitral valve surgery.
Howie MB; Black HA; Romanelli VA; Zvara DA; Myerowitz PD; McSweeney TD
Anesth Analg; 1996 Nov; 83(5):941-8. PubMed ID: 8895267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Propofol-fentanyl anesthesia: a comparison with isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia in coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgery.
Phillips AS; McMurray TJ; Mirakhur RK; Gibson FM; Elliott P
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1994 Jun; 8(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 8061262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of isoflurane and midazolam as hypnotic supplementation to moderately high-dose fentanyl during coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on systemic hemodynamics and early postoperative recovery profile.
Driessen JJ; Giart M
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1997 Oct; 11(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 9327316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized double-blinded multicenter comparison of remifentanil versus fentanyl when combined with isoflurane/propofol for early extubation in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Howie MB; Cheng D; Newman MF; Pierce ET; Hogue C; Hillel Z; Bowdle TA; Bukenya D
Anesth Analg; 2001 May; 92(5):1084-93. PubMed ID: 11323327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A combination of intrathecal morphine and remifentanil anesthesia for fast-track cardiac anesthesia and surgery.
Bowler I; Djaiani G; Abel R; Pugh S; Dunne J; Hall J
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2002 Dec; 16(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 12486651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volatile-based short-term sedation in cardiac surgical patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Jerath A; Beattie SW; Chandy T; Karski J; Djaiani G; Rao V; Yau T; Wasowicz M;
Crit Care Med; 2015 May; 43(5):1062-9. PubMed ID: 25756412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propofol vs isoflurane for neurosurgical anesthesia in Thai patients.
Ittichaikulthol W; Pausawasdi S; Srichintai P; Sarnvivad P
J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 Jul; 80(7):454-60. PubMed ID: 9277075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimal low-flow isoflurane-based anesthesia benefits patients undergoing coronary revascularization via preventing hyperglycemia and maintaining metabolic homeostasis.
Lu CC; Ho ST; Wang JJ; Wong CS; Tsai CS; Chang SY; Lin CY
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 2003 Dec; 41(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 14768513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analysis of anesthesia-controlled operating room time after propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia compared with desflurane anesthesia in ophthalmic surgery: a retrospective study.
Wu ZF; Jian GS; Lee MS; Lin C; Chen YF; Chen YW; Huang YS; Cherng CH; Lu CH
Anesth Analg; 2014 Dec; 119(6):1393-406. PubMed ID: 25211391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of cardiorespiratory variables during isoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia for surgery in injured cats.
Liehmann L; Mosing M; Auer U
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2006 May; 33(3):158-68. PubMed ID: 16634941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
