These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584344)

  • 1. Isotropic visual field effect on spatial orientation and egocentric localization.
    Poquin D; Ohlmann T; Barraud PA
    Spat Vis; 1998; 11(3):261-78. PubMed ID: 9584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visually perceived vertical (VPV): induced changes in orientation by 1-line and 2-line roll-tilted and pitched visual fields.
    Li W; Matin L
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):2037-57. PubMed ID: 15820520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation.
    Matin L; Li W
    J Vestib Res; 1995; 5(6):499-518. PubMed ID: 8589859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand.
    Li W; Matin E; Bertz JW; Matin L
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):18.1-16. PubMed ID: 19146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in perceived elevation and verticality: evidence of a common visual process.
    Shavit AY; Li W; Matin L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(3):205-39. PubMed ID: 23964476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mirror symmetry and parallelism: two opposite rules for the identity transform in space perception and their unified treatment by the Great Circle Model.
    Matin L; Li W
    Spat Vis; 1994; 8(4):469-89. PubMed ID: 7772552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mislocalizations of visual elevation and visual vertical induced by visual pitch: the great circle model.
    Matin L; Li W
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1992 May; 656():242-65. PubMed ID: 1599147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural model for processing the influence of visual orientation on visually perceived eye level (VPEL).
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2845-72. PubMed ID: 11701180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical.
    Vingerhoets RA; De Vrijer M; Van Gisbergen JA; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1321-33. PubMed ID: 19118112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Egocentric reference frame bias in the palmar haptic perception of surface orientation.
    Coleman A; Durgin FH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):955-60. PubMed ID: 24254809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?
    Drakul A; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):629-36. PubMed ID: 27226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influences of visual pitch and visual yaw on visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and straight ahead (VPSA) for erect and rolled-to-horizontal observers.
    Li W; Dallal N; Matin L
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2873-94. PubMed ID: 11701181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization.
    Li W; Matin L
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan; 57(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 7885809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.
    Matin L; Fox CR
    Vision Res; 1989; 29(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 2773342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived self-orientation in allocentric and egocentric space: effects of visual and physical tilt on saccadic and tactile measures.
    Barnett-Cowan M; Harris LR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():231-43. PubMed ID: 18706895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.
    Agathos CP; Bernardin D; Huchet D; Scherlen AC; Assaiante C; Isableu B
    Age (Dordr); 2015 Aug; 37(4):9805. PubMed ID: 26122710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of spatial localization depending on head posture in a perturbed gravitoinertial force field.
    Prieur JM; Bourdin C; Vercher JL; Sarès F; Blouin J; Gauthier GM
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 161(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 15578170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial summation among coextensive and parallel line segments across wide separations (50 degrees): egocentric localization and the great circle model.
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(19):2577-98. PubMed ID: 7975297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial orientation and balance control changes induced by altered gravitoinertial force vectors.
    Kaufman GD; Wood SJ; Gianna CC; Black FO; Paloski WH
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):397-410. PubMed ID: 11355385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudoneglect in back space.
    Cocchini G; Watling R; Della Sala S; Jansari A
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 16934381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.