These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584379)

  • 41. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Long-term survival of the cemented Müller CDH stem: a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
    Salentiny Y; Zwicky L; Ochsner PE; Clauss M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Oct; 138(10):1471-1477. PubMed ID: 30046893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Enhancing proximal femoral pressure during cemented stem insertion.
    Budnar VM; Bannister GC
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 22740281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a roughened femoral stem: integrity of the stem-cement interface.
    Meneghini RM; Feinberg JR; Capello WN
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 12728421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
    Duncan WW; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Timing of femoral prosthesis insertion during cemented arthroplasty: cement curing and static mechanical strength in an in vivo model.
    Hunt S; Stone C; Seal S
    Can J Surg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21251430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Outcomes of Charnley total hip arthroplasty using improved cementing with so-called second- and third-generation techniques.
    Hirose S; Otsuka H; Morishima T; Sato K
    J Orthop Sci; 2012 Mar; 17(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 22189995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum two-year follow-up study.
    Meding JB; Ritter MA; Keating EM; Faris PM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Dec; 79(12):1834-41. PubMed ID: 9409797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using the same femoral component.
    Meding JB; Ritter MA; Davis KE; Hillery M
    Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 26449330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.
    Callaghan JJ; Albright JC; Goetz DD; Olejniczak JP; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Apr; 82(4):487-97. PubMed ID: 10761939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision using the cement-in-cement technique: Average 10.8-year follow-up study.
    Okuzu Y; Goto K; So K; Kuroda Y; Matsuda S
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Nov; 21(6):810-814. PubMed ID: 27553266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [The uncemented cup of the CLS Spotorno joint endoprosthesis--5-years' results].
    Cech O; Dzupa V; Svatos F
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 11706709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Optimizing the femoral component cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty.
    Dennis DA; Lynch CB
    Orthopedics; 2005 Aug; 28(8 Suppl):s867-71. PubMed ID: 16119730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Is a hollow centralizer necessary when using a polished, tapered, cemented femoral stem?
    Weber E; Olsson C; Kesteris U; Flivik G
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Aug; 88(4):377-382. PubMed ID: 28418269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Long-term results of the ABG-1 hydroxyapatite coated total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 111 cases with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
    Bidar R; Kouyoumdjian P; Munini E; Asencio G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):579-87. PubMed ID: 19926546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
    Sandiford NA; Jameson SS; Wilson MJ; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre.
    Hook S; Moulder E; Yates PJ; Burston BJ; Whitley E; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Dec; 88(12):1584-90. PubMed ID: 17159168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany - update 2010].
    Fischer CA; Kaszap B; Drexler C; Lehner B; Clarius M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2012 Jun; 150(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 22354443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.