These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584379)

  • 61. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
    Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Pre-heating of components in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Jafri AA; Green SM; Partington PF; McCaskie AW; Muller SD
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 Nov; 86(8):1214-9. PubMed ID: 15568540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem.
    Leopold SS; Berger RA; Rosenberg AG; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Aug; 81(8):1080-92. PubMed ID: 10466641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Desy NM; Johnson JD; Sierra RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The significance of the micropores at the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement.
    Zhang H; Blunt L; Jiang X; Brown L; Barrans S
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2011; 22(7):845-56. PubMed ID: 21144164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis.
    Scheerlinck T; Delport H; Kiewitt T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 92(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 20124065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Use of the anatomical cemented femoral stem SAS I: mid-term results].
    Mikláš M; Pink M; Valoušek T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2015; 82(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 26317186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Eleven-year follow-up of second-generation metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Park MS; Chung WC; Yoon SJ; Cho HM; Kwon SH
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Apr; 18(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20427827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. One-stage revision of periprosthetic fractures around loose cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Incavo SJ; Beard DM; Pupparo F; Ries M; Wiedel J
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1998 Jan; 27(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 9452834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Femoral Stem Cementation in Hip Arthroplasty: The Know-How of a "Lost" Art.
    Emara AK; Ng M; Krebs VE; Bloomfield M; Molloy RM; Piuzzi NS
    Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med; 2021 Feb; 14(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 33453016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Are There Long-term Benefits to Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Hip Resurfacing?
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Bhaurla SK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 473(10):3197-203. PubMed ID: 26100255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. In vivo failure analysis of intramedullary cement restrictors in 100 hip arthroplasties.
    Bitsch RG; Breusch SJ; Thomsen M; Schneider S; Heisel C
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Aug; 78(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 17966002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Cement-in-cement femoral revisions using a specially designed polished short revision stem; 24 consecutive stems followed for five to seven years.
    te Stroet MA; Moret-Wever SG; de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
    Hip Int; 2014; 24(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 24970322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Peters CL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Higginbotham TO
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 11222897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture.
    Weber M; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Sep; 80(9):1295-305. PubMed ID: 9759814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved femoral cementing techniques. a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a previous report.
    Buckwalter AE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Pedersen DR; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Leinen JA; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jul; 88(7):1481-5. PubMed ID: 16818973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Revision of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique.
    Mounsey EJ; Williams DH; Howell JR; Hubble MJ
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Dec; 97-B(12):1623-7. PubMed ID: 26637675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.