These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584429)

  • 1. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation.
    MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 9584429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presenting two incongruent color words on a single trial does not alter Stroop interference.
    MacLeod CM; Hodder SL
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 9584430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A problem in measuring the Stroop facilitation and interference effects: implications for measuring performance change in general.
    Chen JY
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):1059-70. PubMed ID: 8961342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
    Lindsay DS; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facilitation and interference of selective attention in schizophrenia.
    Taylor SF; Kornblum S; Tandon R
    J Psychiatr Res; 1996; 30(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 8905534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stroop interference and facilitation in the cerebral hemispheres in schizophrenia.
    Phillips ML; Woodruff PW; David AS
    Schizophr Res; 1996 May; 20(1-2):57-68. PubMed ID: 8794494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abnormal processing of irrelevant information in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Carter CS; Krener P; Chaderjian M; Northcutt C; Wolfe V
    Psychiatry Res; 1995 Jan; 56(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 7792343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.
    Glaser MO; Glaser WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):875-94. PubMed ID: 6218237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpreting Stroop interference: an analysis of differences between task versions.
    Salo R; Henik A; Robertson LC
    Neuropsychology; 2001 Oct; 15(4):462-71. PubMed ID: 11761035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.
    Roelofs A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Color priming affects Stroop interference.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 6866673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.
    Fuentes LJ; Ortells JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1993 Dec; 84(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 8128904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining the time course of prime effects on Stroop processing.
    Koch C; Brown JM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 2):675-87. PubMed ID: 7808909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior cingulate cortex and the Stroop task: neuropsychological evidence for topographic specificity.
    Swick D; Jovanovic J
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1240-53. PubMed ID: 11931927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.