101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584431)
1. Retrieval processes that produce interference in modified forced-choice recognition tests.
Chandler CC; Gargano GJ
Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 9584431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Item-specific interference caused by cue-dependent forgetting.
Chandler CC; Gargano GJ
Mem Cognit; 1995 Nov; 23(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 8538443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why do pictures produce priming on the word-fragment completion test? A study of encoding and retrieval factors.
Weldon MS; Jackson-Barrett JL
Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):519-28. PubMed ID: 8350743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. List length and overlap effects in forced-choice associative recognition.
Clark SE; Hori A
Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 7666758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The picture superiority effect in associative recognition.
Hockley WE
Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1351-9. PubMed ID: 18927048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.
Verde MF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1433-48. PubMed ID: 23687918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.
Dehaene S; Akhavein R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):314-26. PubMed ID: 7738503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance benefits and costs in forced choice perceptual identification in amnesia: Effects of prior exposure and word frequency.
Keane MM; Martin E; Verfaellie M
Mem Cognit; 2009 Jul; 37(5):655-66. PubMed ID: 19487757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of generation on auditory implicit memory.
Dew IT; Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1157-67. PubMed ID: 18927034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implicit proactive interference, age, and automatic versus controlled retrieval strategies.
Ikier S; Yang L; Hasher L
Psychol Sci; 2008 May; 19(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 18466406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An information-processing model of three cortical regions: evidence in episodic memory retrieval.
Sohn MH; Goode A; Stenger VA; Jung KJ; Carter CS; Anderson JR
Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 15734340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delayed matching to complex samples and the formation of stimulus classes in children.
Maguire RW; Stromer R; Mackay HA
Psychol Rep; 1995 Dec; 77(3 Pt 2):1059-76. PubMed ID: 8643768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semantic-memory problems.
Ben-Zur H
Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 2796746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chunking during serial learning by a pigeon: III. What are the necessary conditions for establishing a chunk?
Terrace HS; Chen SF
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1991 Jan; 17(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 2002304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.
Hintzman DL; Caulton DA; Levitin DJ
Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 9610117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effects.
Lacey S; Campbell C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):361-76. PubMed ID: 16618639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recognition memory for new associations: electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection.
Donaldson DI; Rugg MD
Neuropsychologia; 1998 May; 36(5):377-95. PubMed ID: 9699947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct evidence for the role of inhibition in resolving interference in memory.
Healey MK; Campbell KL; Hasher L; Ossher L
Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1464-70. PubMed ID: 20807896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of category distinctiveness and stimulus relations on young children's use of retrieval clustering strategies.
Nida RE; Lange G
J Gen Psychol; 1995 Oct; 122(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 8530916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
