These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584431)

  • 21. When encoding fails: instructions, feedback, and registration without learning.
    Hintzman DL; Curran T
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):213-26. PubMed ID: 7731366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of context on discrimination and bias in recognition memory for pictures and words.
    Feenan K; Snodgrass JG
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Sep; 18(5):515-27. PubMed ID: 2233264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A syntactic complexity effect with visual patterns: evidence for the syntactic nature of the memory representation.
    Chechile RA; Anderson JE; Krafczek SA; Coley SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):654-69. PubMed ID: 8656151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What you get out of memory depends on the question you ask.
    Humphreys MS; Dennis S; Maguire AM; Reynolds K; Bolland SW; Hughes JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):797-812. PubMed ID: 14516214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.
    Yee E; Sedivy JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16478336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.
    Eakin DK; Schreiber TA; Sergent-Marshall S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):813-25. PubMed ID: 14516215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.
    Clark SE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 1508049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Induction of a memory retrieval strategy by young children.
    Ackerman BP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Jul; 62(2):243-71. PubMed ID: 8683188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inhibitory processes in memory are impaired in schizophrenia: evidence from retrieval induced forgetting.
    Soriano MF; Jiménez JF; Román P; Bajo MT
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 100(Pt 4):661-73. PubMed ID: 19309536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory.
    Kellogg RT; Cocklin T; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 7137417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model.
    Huber DE; Clark TF; Curran T; Winkielman P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1305-24. PubMed ID: 18980396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Studying related pictures can reduce accuracy, but increase confidence, in a modified recognition test.
    Chandler CC
    Mem Cognit; 1994 May; 22(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 8007831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory.
    Hauer BJ; MacLeod CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 16458848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition.
    Estes WK; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1075-95. PubMed ID: 8744956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Age-related impairment on a forced-choice version of the Mnemonic Similarity Task.
    Huffman DJ; Stark CE
    Behav Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 131(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 28004951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments.
    Inoue C; Bellezza FS
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 9584437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Irrelevant pictures in visual working memory.
    Quinn JG; McConnell J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):200-15. PubMed ID: 8920103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Strength and resistance to interference in practiced recognition: memory retrieval abilities investigated through latent structure modeling.
    Chaiken SR
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(2):219-57. PubMed ID: 11430150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.