These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584434)

  • 1. Serial attention within working memory.
    Garavan H
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 9584434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. All updateable objects in working memory are updated whenever any of them are modified: evidence from the memory updating paradigm.
    Kessler Y; Meiran N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):570-85. PubMed ID: 16719667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
    Unsworth N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term repetition priming of briefly identified objects.
    Breuer AT; Masson ME; Cohen AL; Lindsay DS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 19271861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two dissociable updating processes in working memory.
    Kessler Y; Meiran N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1339-48. PubMed ID: 18980398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: tests of an interference model.
    Isaak MI; Shapiro KL; Martin J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1774-92. PubMed ID: 10641317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory updating latency reflects the cost of switching between maintenance and updating modes of operation.
    Kessler Y; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):738-54. PubMed ID: 24446752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
    Bao M; Li ZH; Zhang DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: encoding failure or retrieval failure?
    Armstrong IT; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Oct; 21(5):1044-52. PubMed ID: 7595242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention.
    Downing PE
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Nov; 11(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 11202491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do updating tasks involve updating? Evidence from comparisons with immediate serial recall.
    Palladino P; Jarrold C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):392-9. PubMed ID: 17935003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prefrontal activity during serial probe reproduction task: encoding, mnemonic, and retrieval processes.
    Inoue M; Mikami A
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 95(2):1008-41. PubMed ID: 16207786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection in spatial working memory is independent of perceptual selective attention, but they interact in a shared spatial priority map.
    Hedge C; Oberauer K; Leonards U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2653-68. PubMed ID: 26341873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accessing information in working memory: can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?
    Oberauer K; Bialkova S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):64-87. PubMed ID: 19203170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.
    Scharlau I
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):224-36. PubMed ID: 12827351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
    Shipstead Z; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.