BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584440)

  • 1. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
    Coltheart V
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serial recall of poor readers in two presentation modalities: combined effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Irausquin RS; de Gelder B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jun; 65(3):342-69. PubMed ID: 9178964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities.
    Steinbrink C; Klatte M
    Dyslexia; 2008 Nov; 14(4):271-90. PubMed ID: 17979186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The distinctiveness of the word-length effect.
    Hulme C; Neath I; Stuart G; Shostak L; Surprenant AM; Brown GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):586-94. PubMed ID: 16719668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strong and long: effects of word length on phonological binding in verbal short-term memory.
    Jefferies E; Frankish C; Noble K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):241-60. PubMed ID: 20680892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory.
    Longoni AM; Richardson JT; Aiello A
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 8433641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verbal short-term memory as an articulatory system: evidence from an alternative paradigm.
    Cheung H; Wooltorton L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):195-223. PubMed ID: 11873847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory.
    Mueller ST; Seymour TL; Kieras DE; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1353-80. PubMed ID: 14622066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. List composition and the word length effect in immediate recall: a comparison of localist and globalist assumptions.
    Cowan N; Baddeley AD; Elliott EM; Norris J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 12747492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition.
    Baddeley A; Chincotta D; Stafford L; Turk D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):353-69. PubMed ID: 12047049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interaction of concreteness and phonological similarity in verbal working memory.
    Acheson DJ; Postle BR; Macdonald MC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):17-36. PubMed ID: 20053042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar patterns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression.
    Bhatarah P; Ward G; Smith J; Hayes L
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jul; 37(5):689-713. PubMed ID: 19487760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexicality and phonological similarity: a challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?
    Fallon AB; Mak E; Tehan G; Daly C
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15948620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
    Roodenrys S; Guitard D; Miller LM; Saint-Aubin J; Barron JM
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1100-1120. PubMed ID: 35692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of word length in short-term memory: Is rehearsal necessary?
    Campoy G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):724-34. PubMed ID: 17853214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.
    Martin CS; Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Summers WV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 2526857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.