These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584440)

  • 1. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
    Coltheart V
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serial recall of poor readers in two presentation modalities: combined effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Irausquin RS; de Gelder B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jun; 65(3):342-69. PubMed ID: 9178964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities.
    Steinbrink C; Klatte M
    Dyslexia; 2008 Nov; 14(4):271-90. PubMed ID: 17979186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The distinctiveness of the word-length effect.
    Hulme C; Neath I; Stuart G; Shostak L; Surprenant AM; Brown GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):586-94. PubMed ID: 16719668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strong and long: effects of word length on phonological binding in verbal short-term memory.
    Jefferies E; Frankish C; Noble K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):241-60. PubMed ID: 20680892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory.
    Longoni AM; Richardson JT; Aiello A
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 8433641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verbal short-term memory as an articulatory system: evidence from an alternative paradigm.
    Cheung H; Wooltorton L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):195-223. PubMed ID: 11873847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory.
    Mueller ST; Seymour TL; Kieras DE; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1353-80. PubMed ID: 14622066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. List composition and the word length effect in immediate recall: a comparison of localist and globalist assumptions.
    Cowan N; Baddeley AD; Elliott EM; Norris J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 12747492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition.
    Baddeley A; Chincotta D; Stafford L; Turk D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):353-69. PubMed ID: 12047049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interaction of concreteness and phonological similarity in verbal working memory.
    Acheson DJ; Postle BR; Macdonald MC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):17-36. PubMed ID: 20053042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar patterns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression.
    Bhatarah P; Ward G; Smith J; Hayes L
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jul; 37(5):689-713. PubMed ID: 19487760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexicality and phonological similarity: a challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?
    Fallon AB; Mak E; Tehan G; Daly C
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15948620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
    Roodenrys S; Guitard D; Miller LM; Saint-Aubin J; Barron JM
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1100-1120. PubMed ID: 35692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of word length in short-term memory: Is rehearsal necessary?
    Campoy G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):724-34. PubMed ID: 17853214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.
    Martin CS; Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Summers WV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 2526857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.