BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584605)

  • 21. [A national population-based screening program for cervical cancer in Israel, need for re-evaluation].
    Benshushan A; Antebi SO
    Harefuah; 2000 Sep; 139(5-6):217-20. PubMed ID: 11062956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical cancer screening among U.S. women: analyses of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
    Hewitt M; Devesa SS; Breen N
    Prev Med; 2004 Aug; 39(2):270-8. PubMed ID: 15226035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
    Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Risk factors encountered in cases of cervix cancer and in precarcinomatous conditions (author's transl)].
    Králová A
    Cesk Gynekol; 1975 Aug; 40(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 1175244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stat bite: Frequency of cervical cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(23):1741. PubMed ID: 15572755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Rare cytologic findings by gynecologic examinations (author's transl)].
    Büttner HH; Beust M
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1977; 47(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 921484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Computerized monitoring for integrated cervical screening. Rationale, methods and indicators of participation].
    Bucchi L; Pierri C; Caprara L; Cortecchia S; De Lillo M; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 2003 Feb; 95(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 12735281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Social support and cervical and breast cancer screening in Argentinean women from a rural population.
    Gamarra CJ; Paz EP; Griep RH
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correlation between smoking status and cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study.
    MacLaughlan SD; Lachance JA; Gjelsvik A
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Apr; 15(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 21478697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Knowledge of the cervical cancer screening process among rural and urban illinois women undergoing colposcopy.
    Massad LS; Verhulst SJ; Hagemeyer M; Brady P
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Oct; 10(4):252-5. PubMed ID: 17012992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Results of the study of the cervix in patients under contraceptive therapy].
    García-Huidobro M; Puga J
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1972; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 4669129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Working study on the organization of diagnosis and therapy of early precancerous stages of cervix carcinoma. II. Postulates for the realization of a general cytoprevention program in the Berlin-Friedrichshain urban district].
    Moltz L; Kaiser P
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1973 Feb; 67(4):206-7. PubMed ID: 4698061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden.
    Andersson-Ellström A; Seidal T; Grannas M; Hagmar B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: the influence of population screening on incidence and stage distribution of invasive cases.
    Gad C
    Dan Med Bull; 1976 May; 23(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 949913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [What is the reason for non-participation in mass screening of cervix neoplasms?].
    Fortelius P; Haapoja H; Hakulinen T
    Duodecim; 1974; 90(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 4411522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Prevalence of preclinical lesions of the cervix uteri].
    Dabancens A
    Rev Med Chil; 1986 Jun; 114(6):586-90. PubMed ID: 3575955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation of cervical cytology and visual inspection with acetic acid in HIV-positive women.
    Akinwuntan AL; Adesina OA; Okolo CA; Oluwasola OA; Oladokun A; Ifemeje AA; Adewole IF
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Aug; 28(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 19003664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Population screening for uterine cervix cancer: the negative effects of insufficient knowledge as to what is normal and abnormal].
    van der Graaf Y
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(34):1569-71. PubMed ID: 12224477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Wachtel E
    Practitioner; 1973 Aug; 211(262):137-42. PubMed ID: 4580608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.