These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584809)

  • 1. Levels of microbial contamination on surgical instruments.
    Rutala WA; Gergen MF; Jones JF; Weber DJ
    Am J Infect Control; 1998 Apr; 26(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 9584809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of microbial load on surgical instruments after clinical use and following manual and automated cleaning.
    Evangelista Sde S; dos Santos SG; de Resende Stoianoff MA; de Oliveira AC
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 May; 43(5):522-7. PubMed ID: 25952049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reprocessing safety issues associated with complex-design orthopaedic loaned surgical instruments and implants.
    Costa DM; Lopes LKO; Vickery K; Watanabe E; Vasconcelos LSNOL; de Paula MC; Melo DS; Hu H; Deva AK; Tipple AFV
    Injury; 2018 Nov; 49(11):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 30236794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbial contamination of surgical instruments used for laparotomy.
    Saito Y; Kobayashi H; Uetera Y; Yasuhara H; Kajiura T; Okubo T
    Am J Infect Control; 2014 Jan; 42(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 24189327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of cleaning guidelines implementation on microbial colony count of laparoscopic instruments: A study in a public hospital in Iran.
    Aarabi A; Mosleh S; Fazeli H; Farahmand H
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2020 Jul; 13(3):272-278. PubMed ID: 31430059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the microbial load in instruments used in orthopedic surgeries.
    Pinto FM; de Souza RQ; da Silva CB; Mimica LM; Graziano KU
    Am J Infect Control; 2010 Apr; 38(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 19913328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flash sterilization. Is it safe for routine use?
    Harris MH
    AORN J; 1992 Jun; 55(6):1547-51. PubMed ID: 1610153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biochemical and microbial contamination of surgical devices: a quantitative analysis.
    Cloutman-Green E; Canales M; Zhou Q; Ciric L; Hartley JC; McDonnell G
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 Jun; 43(6):659-61. PubMed ID: 25818023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-level disinfection, sterilization, and antisepsis: current issues in reprocessing medical and surgical instruments.
    Seavey R
    Am J Infect Control; 2013 May; 41(5 Suppl):S111-7. PubMed ID: 23622741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Levels of naturally occurring microorganisms on surgical instruments after clinical use and after washing.
    Chu NS; Chan-Myers H; Ghazanfari N; Antonoplos P
    Am J Infect Control; 1999 Aug; 27(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 10433669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complex design of surgical instruments as barrier for cleaning effectiveness, favouring biofilm formation.
    Lopes LKO; Costa DM; Tipple AFV; Watanabe E; Castillo RB; Hu H; Deva AK; Vickery K
    J Hosp Infect; 2019 Sep; 103(1):e53-e60. PubMed ID: 30423413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three steps forward: Designing a superior sterile processing system.
    Bransby D
    OR Manager; 2016 Oct; 32(10):25-7. PubMed ID: 29978977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flash sterilization and instrument tape--an experimental study.
    Kostyal DA; Verhage JM; Beezhold DH; Beck WC
    J Healthc Mater Manage; 1993 Oct; 11(9):34-5. PubMed ID: 10129224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new look at the OR substerile area.
    Reichert M; Schultz JK
    OR Manager; 2002 Jan; 18(1):22, 24. PubMed ID: 11842766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of an oil-based lubricant on the effectiveness of the sterilization processes .
    Rutala WA; Gergen MF; Weber DJ
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 18171191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring and improving the effectiveness of cleaning medical and surgical devices.
    Alfa MJ
    Am J Infect Control; 2013 May; 41(5 Suppl):S56-9. PubMed ID: 23622750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of hand hygiene and glove use on cleanliness of reusable surgical instruments.
    Costa DM; Lopes LKO; Tipple AFV; Castillo RB; Hu H; Deva AK; Vickery K
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Dec; 97(4):348-352. PubMed ID: 28647423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural bioburden levels detected on rigid lumened medical devices before and after cleaning.
    Chan-Myers H; McAlister D; Antonoplos P
    Am J Infect Control; 1997 Dec; 25(6):471-6. PubMed ID: 9437486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of a washer-disinfector in eliminating healthcare-associated pathogens from surgical instruments.
    Rutala WA; Gergen MF; Weber DJ
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 35(7):883-5. PubMed ID: 24915220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antimicrobial activity of glucoprotamin: a clinical study of a new disinfectant for instruments.
    Widmer AE; Frei R
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Oct; 24(10):762-4. PubMed ID: 14587939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.