These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9584903)

  • 1. The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials.
    Schmalz G
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Apr; 106(2 Pt 2):696-706. PubMed ID: 9584903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The irritant effect of plastic filling materials on the dental pulp].
    Götze W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):486-8. PubMed ID: 6773734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials.
    Geurtsen W
    Crit Rev Oral Biol Med; 2000; 11(3):333-55. PubMed ID: 11021634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities.
    Costa CA; Giro EM; do Nascimento AB; Teixeira HM; Hebling J
    Dent Mater; 2003 Dec; 19(8):739-46. PubMed ID: 14511732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Amalgam. X. Glass-ionomer cement: a biocompatible substitute for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Nov; 100(11):484-8. PubMed ID: 11822129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bonding over Dentin Replacement Materials.
    Meraji N; Camilleri J
    J Endod; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1343-1349. PubMed ID: 28662878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical testing of dental materials--histological considerations.
    Goldberg M; Lasfargues JJ; Legrand JM
    J Dent; 1994; 22 Suppl 2():S25-8. PubMed ID: 7844272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [New direct restorative materials].
    Hickel R; Dasch W; Janda R; Tyas M; Anusavice K
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Apr; 106(4):128-40. PubMed ID: 11930356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
    Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conservative restoration of compromised posterior teeth with direct composites: a 7-year report.
    Magne P
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 12(8):747-9. PubMed ID: 11404870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: a review.
    Hse KM; Leung SK; Wei SH
    Aust Dent J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10217014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
    Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.