These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9586201)

  • 1. Respirator performance ratings for speech intelligibility.
    Coyne KM; Johnson AT; Yeni-Komshian GH; Dooly CR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Apr; 59(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 9586201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility during respirator wear: influences of respirator speech diaphragm size and background noise.
    Caretti DM; Strickler LC
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(6):846-50. PubMed ID: 14674794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech intelligibility while wearing full-facepiece air-purifying respirators.
    Coyne KM; Barker DJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(11):751-6. PubMed ID: 24689436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diminished speech intelligibility associated with certain types of respirators worn by healthcare workers.
    Radonovich LJ; Yanke R; Cheng J; Bender B
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jan; 7(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 19904661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech intelligibility test methodology applied to powered air-purifying respirators used in healthcare.
    Xu S; Simons J; Yorio P; Rottach D; Zhuang Z; Radonovich L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2021 Jan; 18(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 33284081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech synthesis in background noise: effects of message formulation and visual information on the intelligibility of American English DECTalk.
    Drager KD; Anderson JL; Debarros J; Hayes E; Liebman J; Panek E
    Augment Altern Commun; 2007 Jun; 23(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17487630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single word and sentence intelligibility in children with cochlear implants.
    Khwaileh FA; Flipsen P
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Sep; 24(9):722-33. PubMed ID: 20645856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of speaker and listener variables on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Patel R; Usher N; Kember H; Russell S; Laures-Gore J
    J Commun Disord; 2014; 51():13-8. PubMed ID: 25113966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of In-Ear Device Use With Communication Quality Among Individuals Wearing Personal Protective Equipment in a Simulated Operating Room.
    Nguyen DL; Kay-Rivest E; Tewfik MA; Hier M; Lehmann A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e216857. PubMed ID: 33871614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Telephone communications with several commercial respirators.
    Johnson AT; Scott WH; Coyne KM; Koh FC; Rebar JE
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 11767932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.