These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9586475)

  • 1. A comparative study of removal torque of endosseous implants in the fibula, iliac crest and scapula of cadavers: preliminary report.
    Niimi A; Ozeki K; Ueda M; Nakayama B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Aug; 8(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 9586475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primary stability of simultaneously placed dental implants in extraoral donor graft sites: a human cadaver study.
    Akkocaoglu M; Cehreli MC; Tekdemir I; Comert A; Güzel E; Dağdeviren A; Akca K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 65(3):400-7. PubMed ID: 17307584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interface of unloaded titanium implants in the iliac crest, fibula, and scapula: a histomorphometric and biomechanical study in the pig.
    Rohner D; Tay A; Chung SM; Hutmacher DW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 14982355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone response to unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula: an animal study in the Yorkshire pig.
    Rohner D; Meng CS; Hutmacher DW; Tsai KT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 32(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 14505621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative densitometric study of iliac crest and scapula bone in relation to osseous integrated dental implants in microvascular mandibular reconstruction.
    Beckers A; Schenck C; Klesper B; Koebke J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Apr; 26(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 9617669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early bone resorption of free microvascular reanastomized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction--a comparison of iliac crest and fibula grafts.
    Mertens C; Decker C; Engel M; Sander A; Hoffmann J; Freier K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e217-23. PubMed ID: 24269641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Osseointegrated implants: a comparative study of bone thickness in four vascularized bone flaps.
    Frodel JL; Funk GF; Capper DT; Fridrich KL; Blumer JR; Haller JR; Hoffman HT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Sep; 92(3):449-55; discussion 456-8. PubMed ID: 8341743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different surface modifications for titanium implants installed into the goat iliac crest.
    van Oirschot BA; Meijer GJ; Bronkhorst EM; Närhi T; Jansen JA; van den Beucken JJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):e57-67. PubMed ID: 25486997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative radiologic study of bone density and cortical thickness of donor bone used in mandibular reconstruction.
    Myoung H; Kim YY; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Kim MJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11458242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative clinicoanatomical study of ilium and fibula as two commonly used bony donor sites for maxillofacial reconstruction.
    Sönmez TT; Prescher A; Salama A; Kanatas A; Zor F; Mitchell D; Zaker Shahrak A; Karaaltin MV; Knobe M; Külahci Y; Altuntas SH; Ghassemi A; Hölzle F
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):736-41. PubMed ID: 23992826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphological and morphometric evaluation of the ilium, fibula, and scapula bones for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction.
    Zaker Shahrak A; Zor F; Kanatas A; Acikel C; Sapountzis S; Nicoli F; Altuntas SH; Knobe M; Chen HC; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Sönmez TT
    Microsurgery; 2014 Nov; 34(8):638-45. PubMed ID: 25143304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vascularized bone flaps in oromandibular reconstruction. A comparative anatomic study of bone stock from various donor sites to assess suitability for enosseous dental implants.
    Moscoso JF; Keller J; Genden E; Weinberg H; Biller HF; Buchbinder D; Urken ML
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Jan; 120(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 8274254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone that best matches the properties of the mandible.
    Seikaly H; Chau J; Li F; Driscoll B; Seikaly D; Calhoun J; Calhoun KH
    J Otolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 32(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 14587569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons of bone volumes and densities relating to osseointegrated implants in microvascularly reconstructed mandibles: a study of cadaveric radius and fibula bones.
    Klesper B; Wahn J; Koebke J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 28(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 10958424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of surgical techniques on primary implant stability and peri-implant bone.
    Fanuscu MI; Chang TL; Akça K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2487-91. PubMed ID: 18022474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraosseous stability of dental implants in free revascularized fibula and iliac crest bone flaps.
    Möhlhenrich SC; Kniha K; Elvers D; Ayoub N; Goloborodko E; Hölzle F; Modabber A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1935-1939. PubMed ID: 27769721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 23638908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro.
    Akça K; Kökat AM; Cömert A; Akkocaoğlu M; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 20036107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs.
    Salmória KK; Tanaka OM; Guariza-Filho O; Camargo ES; de Souza LT; Maruo H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e15-22. PubMed ID: 18538236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.