These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9586477)

  • 1. Accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of peri-implant radiolucencies--an in vitro experiment.
    Sewerin IP; Gotfredsen K; Stoltze K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Aug; 8(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 9586477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.
    Pikner SS
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (194):5-69, 2. PubMed ID: 18652086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are Intraoral Radiographs Accurate in Determining the Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level?
    Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30025001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter- and intraobserver variability in radiographic bone level assessment at Brånemark fixtures.
    Gröndahl K; Sundén S; Gröndahl HG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Aug; 9(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 9760899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
    Batenburg RH; Meijer HJ; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9780899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
    Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Sep; 32(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 16104954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions.
    Salvi GE; Lang NP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19 Suppl():116-27. PubMed ID: 15635952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal peri-implant clinical responses in anterior mandibles of female patients: a preliminary report.
    Ow RK; Zarb GA; Schmitt A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):689-95. PubMed ID: 10347357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Brånemark dental implants.
    Sundén S; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Dec; 6(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 8603113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peri-implant bone loss around posterior mandible dental implants placed after distraction osteogenesis: preliminary findings.
    Polo WC; de Araujo NS; Lima YB; Joly JC; Sendyk WR; Cury PR
    J Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 78(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 17274707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are intraoral radiographs reliable in determining peri-implant marginal bone level changes? The correlation between open surgical measurements and peri-apical radiographs.
    Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1358-1364. PubMed ID: 29866412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra-surgical vs. radiographic bone level assessments in measuring peri-implant bone loss.
    Serino G; Sato H; Holmes P; Turri A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1396-1400. PubMed ID: 28009061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and radiographic evaluation, following delivery of fixed reconstructions, at GBR treated titanium fixtures.
    Mayfield L; Skoglund A; Nobréus N; Attström R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Oct; 9(5):292-302. PubMed ID: 9835808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology.
    Peñarrocha M; Palomar M; Sanchis JM; Guarinos J; Balaguer J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):861-7. PubMed ID: 15623062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlations between radiographic, clinical and mobility parameters after loading of oral implants with fixed partial dentures. A 2-year longitudinal study.
    Brägger U; Hugel-Pisoni C; Bürgin W; Buser D; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Sep; 7(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 9151587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri-implant bone density.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Lang NP; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 1809671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis.
    Laurell L; Lundgren D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Mar; 13(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 19681932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
    King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.