166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9586484)
1. Dr. Shulman responds to Dr. Moses's "Good science, bad science" editorial in July 1996 CRANIO.
Shulman J
Cranio; 1997 Jan; 15(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 9586484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Why NIH is wrong about "TMD".
Dawson PE
Cranio; 1997 Jan; 15(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9586482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is NIH capable of changing the lifestyle of all TMD patients?
King RK
Cranio; 2000 Jan; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 11202816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dr. Bever underscores Dr. Dawson's January '97 editorial.
Bever GJ
Cranio; 1997 Apr; 15(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 9586510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dr. Lau responds to CRANIO's October '04 Concepts Editorial.
Lau KU
Cranio; 2005 Jan; 23(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 15727315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Symptom Management in Cancer: Pain, Depression, and Fatigue, July 15-17, 2002.
Forcina JM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Jul; 96(14):1109-10; author reply 1110. PubMed ID: 15265975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Say it ain't so!".
Shankland WE
Cranio; 1996 Oct; 14(4):254-5. PubMed ID: 9110619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Panelists' views of 68 NIH consensus conference.
Ferguson JH; Sherman CR
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(4):542-58. PubMed ID: 11758298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patients as partners: comments of Dr. Uppgaard on Dr. Riley Lunn's Concepts editorial in October CRANIO.
Uppgaard RO
Cranio; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12555925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Occlusion's role in TMD problems? An interview with Dr. Robert Kerstein.
Kerstein R
Dent Today; 1996 Mar; 15(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 9567803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What's all this talk about randomized, double blind, clinical trials?
Radke JC
Cranio; 2000 Jan; 18(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11212855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Re: Green et al: "Temporomandibular disorders and science: A response to the critics".
Dawson PE
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):249-50. PubMed ID: 9922446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The NIH condom report: the glass is 90% full.
Cates W
Fam Plann Perspect; 2001; 33(5):231-3. PubMed ID: 11589545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The NIH Consensus Development Program. The evolution of guidelines.
Ferguson JH
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1996; 12(3):460-74. PubMed ID: 8840666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occlusal adjustment: quo vadis?
Ash MM
Cranio; 2003 Jan; 21(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12555922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Life-long adherence to diet recommended for PKU patients.
Rollins G
Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2001 Jan; 12(1):9-10, 12. PubMed ID: 11766719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. TMJ controversy: we can't keep our heads buried in the sand forever!
Beavers S
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2007; 18(4):10-3. PubMed ID: 18220004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An evidence-based assessment of occlusal adjustment as a treatment for temporomandibular disorders.
Tsukiyama Y; Baba K; Clark GT
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 11458263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AMA responds to Dr. Riley Lunn's editorial in the October 2002 issue of CRANIO.
Maves MD
Cranio; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12555924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurobiology of central nervous system tumors in children.
Maria BL
J Child Neurol; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1101-2. PubMed ID: 18952576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
