232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9587265)
1. An analysis of how infection-control research applies to the dental-laboratory environment.
Sabatini BM
Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1995 Jun; 12(5):26-8. PubMed ID: 9587265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hand care and waterlines: update for the dental profession.
Myers R
Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):132-6. PubMed ID: 15559466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dental laboratory and infection control.
Wanner JD
Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 1993; 60(5):24-6. PubMed ID: 7516528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health Care Settings--a review.
Bebermeyer RD; Dickinson SK; Thomas LP
Tex Dent J; 2005 Oct; 122(10):1022-6. PubMed ID: 16350459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal infection control. Utilizing an autoclave in the dental laboratory.
Weber DE; Wolf KE
J Dent Technol; 1999 Nov; 16(9):15-8. PubMed ID: 10863469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental surface infection control, 2003.
Molinari JA; Palenik CJ
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):30, 32-34, 36-37. PubMed ID: 15641332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Backflow prevention and the dental unit.
Dent Assist; 1996; 65(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 9525126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Combating cross-contamination between dental labs and offices.
McDermott J
Dent Today; 1996 Mar; 15(3):94-5. PubMed ID: 9567807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Responding to anthrax.
Borg MA; Tieck WC
J Dent Technol; 2001; 18(8):12-4, 28. PubMed ID: 11885187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 2003 CDC guidelines offer more choices for managing operatory surfaces.
Organization for Safety and Asepsis Procedures
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Nov; 32(11):913-6, 918. PubMed ID: 15651468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Looking inside the 2003 CDC dental infection control guidelines.
Harte JA
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Nov; 32(11):919-30. PubMed ID: 15651469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sterilizer monitoring: rationale for using biological indicators.
Staat RH
Dent Today; 2004 Nov; 23(11):130-3; quiz 133. PubMed ID: 15622888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Chemical products confuse users by claiming varying capabilities and contact times.
Miller C
RDH; 1996 Nov; 16(11):40, 56. PubMed ID: 9442672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Contamination of dental unit waterlines: a re-evaluation.
Gaudie WM
J N Z Soc Periodontol; 2006; (89):12-6. PubMed ID: 16913366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The OSHA lowdown on occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Gile TJ
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Jun; 33(6):14-20; quiz 22-3. PubMed ID: 11424285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical infection control in dental laboratories.
Plummer KD; Wakefield CW
Gen Dent; 1994; 42(6):545-8. PubMed ID: 23087983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infection control in dental radiology.
Puttaiah R; Langlais RP; Katz JO; Langland OE
W V Dent J; 1995 Jun; 69(3):15-20. PubMed ID: 9518860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An endodontic perspective of contemporary infection control procedures.
Hoen MM; Braud JP
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2004 Jul; 25(7):511-8; quiz 519. PubMed ID: 15637967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re-engineering infection control: trends, techniques and technologies.
Farr C
Dent Today; 1996 Aug; 15(8):76-81. PubMed ID: 9567795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Lab portion of OSHA Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens.
Harty-Golder B
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Jun; 33(6):10. PubMed ID: 11424284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
