These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9587267)
1. A close look at the restorative needs of patients with dental implants: Part 1. Voitik AJ Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1995 Jun; 12(5):36-41. PubMed ID: 9587267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A close look at the restorative needs of patients with dental implants: Part 2. Voitik AJ Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1995; 12(6):45-9. PubMed ID: 9587262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone, dental implants and biomechanics. A close look at the restorative needs of patients with dental implants: Part 3. Voitik AJ Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1995 Sep; 12(7):38-43. PubMed ID: 9584706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The microcirculatory function of mastication: SEM observation of vascular resin casts around dental implants and the periodontal ligament. Matsuo M Kaibogaku Zasshi; 2000 Oct; 75(5):467-70. PubMed ID: 11155694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphofunctional aspects of dental implants. Meyer G; Fanghänel J; Proff P Ann Anat; 2012 Mar; 194(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 22137145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusal considerations for implant restorations in the partially edentulous patient. Curtis DA; Sharma A; Finzen FC; Kao RT J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Oct; 28(10):771-9. PubMed ID: 11326520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Engineering considerations in the design of abutments. Katona TR Compendium; 1990 Jun; 11(6):382, 384-6, 388. PubMed ID: 2083415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of a masticatory robot to analyze the shock absorption capacity of different restorative materials for prosthetic implants: a preliminary report. Conserva E; Menini M; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Ravera G; Pera F; Pera P Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 19260428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of jaw closing forces: a comparison between natural tooth and osseointegrated implant. Leung T; Lai VF Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Sep; 8(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 11307564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consideration of biomechanical stress in treatment with dental implants. Misch CE Dent Today; 2006 May; 25(5):80, 82, 84-5; quiz 85. PubMed ID: 16729498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of bruxism on treatment planning for dental implants. Misch CE Dent Today; 2002 Sep; 21(9):76-81. PubMed ID: 12271847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Dental implants in tooth grinders]. Lobbezoo F; Brouwers JE; Cune MS; Naeije M Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Mar; 111(3):85-90. PubMed ID: 15058243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Kim Y; Oh TJ; Misch CE; Wang HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 15642028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone stress for a mini-implant close to the roots of adjacent teeth--3D finite element analysis. Motoyoshi M; Ueno S; Okazaki K; Shimizu N Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 38(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 19269789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of tooth removal on mandibular bone response to mastication. Field C; Li Q; Li W; Swain M Arch Oral Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(12):1129-37. PubMed ID: 18675952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]