188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9587320)
21. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1997 Nov; 23(11):698-702. PubMed ID: 9587312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modeling capacity of ENDOflash files in simulated root canals.
Fariniuk LF; Baratto-Filho F; Guerisoli DM; Barbizam JV; Pécora JD; Sousa-Neto MD
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11210250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET)--a crown-down root canal preparation technique: basic concepts, operative procedure and instruments.
Riitano F
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):575-87. PubMed ID: 16011778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
Reddy SA; Hicks ML
J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of shaft design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel-titanium rotary systems by means of spiral computerized tomography.
Versiani MA; Pascon EA; de Sousa CJ; Borges MA; Sousa-Neto MD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 18424117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction.
Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
Park H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems.
Hinrichs RE; Walker WA; Schindler WG
J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9641140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files.
Grande NM; Plotino G; Butti A; Messina F; Pameijer CH; Somma F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17178505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of instrumentation using Naviflex and Profile nickel-titanium engine-driven rotary instruments.
Ottosen SR; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 10530251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Determination of root canal curvatures before and after canal preparation (part II): A method based on numeric calculus.
Sonntag D; Stachniss-Carp S; Stachniss C; Stachniss V
Aust Endod J; 2006 Apr; 32(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16603041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
