These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9587746)

  • 1. Comparative assessment of digital and analog radiography: diagnostic accuracy, cost analysis and quality of care.
    Colin C; Vergnon P; Guibaud L; Borson O; Pinaudeau D; Perret Du Cray MH; Pasquier JM; Tran-Minh V
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 26(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 9587746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital vs conventional radiography: cost and revenue analysis.
    Dalla Palma L; Grisi G; Cuttin R; Rimondini A
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1682-92. PubMed ID: 10525891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Walcher M; Pohl M; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.
    Andersen ER; Jorde J; Taoussi N; Yaqoob SH; Konst B; Seierstad T
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22287147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost accounting of radiological examinations. Cost analysis of radiological examinations of intermediate referral hospitals and general practice.
    Lääperi AL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 407():1-54. PubMed ID: 8804226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Films reject analysis for conventional radiography in Iranian main hospitals.
    Roohi Shalemaei R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):220-2. PubMed ID: 21764806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis and Economic Implication of X-Ray Film Reject in Diagnostic Radiology Department of Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.
    Zewdu M; Kadir E; Berhane M
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2017 Jul; 27(4):421-426. PubMed ID: 29217944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Costs of plain-film radiography in a partially digitized radiology department. An activity-based cost analysis.
    Alanen J; Keski-Nisula L; Laurila J; Suramo I; Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG; Brommels M
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Mar; 39(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 9529455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost analysis of digital vs analogue radiography.
    Dalla Palma L
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10 Suppl 3():S386-9. PubMed ID: 11001453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The radiographer's role in increasing the efficiency of the diagnostic imaging department.
    Racoveanu NT
    Radiography; 1984; 50(592):151-8. PubMed ID: 6463221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Giacomuzzi SM; Jaschke W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):69-71. PubMed ID: 11487846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost of managing digital diagnostic images for a 614-bed hospital.
    Dwyer SJ; Templeton AW; Martin NL; Cook LT; Lee KR; Levine E; Batnitzky S; Preston DF; Rosenthal SJ; Price HI; Anderson WH; Tarlton MA; Faszold S
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Dec; 15(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 12612789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Costs and performance in roentgen diagnosis--conventional technique versus digital technique].
    Brandt GA; Homburg M; Cimanowski N; Ohmen E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Nov; 7(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 9467031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cost-effectiveness evaluation of a digital radiography system].
    Guillaume L; Joris T; Mandry D; Kammacher L; Claudon M
    J Radiol; 2007; 88(7-8 Pt 1):963-7. PubMed ID: 17878853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct radiography can boost radiology productivity, cut costs.
    Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Mar; 3(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 10178786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.