These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9587746)

  • 21. Soft-copy computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: cost-savings analysis.
    Don S; Albertina MJ; Ammann DL; Evens RG; Siegel MJ
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):501-5. PubMed ID: 7480702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the conventional film-screen technique in diagnosis of fractures].
    Fink U; Schwerdtfeger J; Fink BK; Schätzl M; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 8645859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of digital radiography using stimulable phosphor for diagnosis of pneumothorax.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andrésdóttir A; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A
    Acta Radiol; 1990 Jan; 31(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2187511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures.
    Tonkopi E; Daniels C; Gale MJ; Schofield SC; Sorhaindo VA; Vanlarkin JL
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 22136965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of image quality using a X-ray stereotactical whole-body system and a direct flat-panel X-ray device in examinations of the pelvis and knee.
    Krug KB; Weber C; Schwabe H; Sinzig NM; Wein B; Müller D; Wegmann K; Peters S; Sendler V; Ewen K; Hellmich M; Maintz D
    Rofo; 2014 Jan; 186(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 23999782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selenium-based digital radiography in the detection of bone lesions: preliminary experience with experimentally created defects.
    Ludwig K; Link TM; Fiebich M; Renger B; Diederich S; Oelerich M; Lenzen H; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):220-4. PubMed ID: 10887251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gastrointestinal imaging: a systems analysis comparing digital and conventional techniques.
    Chawla S; Levine MS; Laufer I; Gingold EL; Kelly TJ; Langlotz CP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 10227502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital chest radiography: clinical aspects.
    Tylén U
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7734532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experiences with computed radiography: can we afford the cost?
    Bragg DG; Murray KA; Tripp D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 9308439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Agreement and reading time for differently-priced devices for the digital capture of X-ray films.
    Salazar AJ; Camacho JC; Aguirre DA
    J Telemed Telecare; 2012 Mar; 18(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 22169230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.
    Nol J; Isouard G; Mirecki J
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The diagnostic value of digital and conventional imaging in intravenous urography].
    Hundt C; Kohz P; Leinsinger G; Fink U; Schätzl M
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 8527752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An evaluation of the financial impacts of optical disk storage for digital radiography.
    Stockburger WT
    Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 10284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.