These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9588469)

  • 21. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
    Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
    Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
    Cunningham BW
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. PubMed ID: 15541670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
    Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
    Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanical performance of the new posterior spinal implant: effect of materials, connecting plate, and pedicle screw design.
    Chen PQ; Lin SJ; Wu SS; So H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(9):881-6; discussion 887. PubMed ID: 12942002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine with anterior interbody fusion on the different locations of the bone grafts.
    Cheng CK; Chen CS; Liu CL
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 12652031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Localized trabecular damage adjacent to interbody fusion devices.
    Warden KE; Davy DT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):874-80. PubMed ID: 20395779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanical evaluation of a canine intervertebral disc spacer: in situ and in vivo studies.
    Vuono-Hawkins M; Zimmerman MC; Lee CK; Carter FM; Parsons JR; Langrana NA
    J Orthop Res; 1994 Jan; 12(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 8113934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Initial stability of porous coated acetabular implants. The effect of screw placement, screw tightness, defect type, and oversize implants.
    Hadjari MH; Hollis JM; Hofmann OE; Flahiff CM; Nelson CL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Oct; (307):117-23. PubMed ID: 7924023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Mechanical studies of lumbar interbody fusion implants].
    Bader RJ; Steinhauser E; Rechl H; Mittelmeier W; Bertagnoli R; Gradinger R
    Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):459-65. PubMed ID: 12089795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mechanical testing of spinal instrumentation.
    Ashman RB; Birch JG; Bone LB; Corin JD; Herring JA; Johnston CE; Ritterbush JF; Roach JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Feb; 227():113-25. PubMed ID: 3338201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Flexible device for vertebral body replacement.
    Main JA; Wells ME; Spengler DM; Strauss AM; Keller TS
    J Biomed Eng; 1989 Mar; 11(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 2704210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Osteosyntheses and replacement of vertebral bodies in spinal tumors].
    Griss P
    Orthopade; 1987 Sep; 16(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 3320861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting.
    Ernstberger T; Heidrich G; Bruening T; Krefft S; Buchhorn G; Klinger HM
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Feb; 16(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 16463200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shear force measurements on low- and high-stiffness posterior fusion devices.
    Melnyk AD; Chak JD; Cripton PA; Dvorak MF; Oxland TR
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Nov; 34(9):1260-7. PubMed ID: 22284671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.