275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9588509)
1. Determination of 60% or greater carotid stenosis: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound with conventional angiography.
Jackson MR; Chang AS; Robles HA; Gillespie DL; Olsen SB; Kaiser WJ; Goff JM; O'Donnell SD; Rich NM
Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 9588509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials.
AbuRahma AF; Robinson PA; Strickler DL; Alberts S; Young L
Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 12(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 9676932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive multivariate regression to increase the specificity of carotid duplex ultrasound for high-grade stenosis in asymptomatic patients.
Carnicelli AP; Stone JJ; Doyle A; Chowdhry A; Gillespie DL; Chandra A
Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Aug; 28(6):1548-55. PubMed ID: 24530716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT angiography-derived duplex ultrasound velocity criteria in patients with carotid artery stenosis.
Doyle AJ; Stone JJ; Carnicelli AP; Chandra A; Gillespie DL
Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Jul; 28(5):1219-26. PubMed ID: 24456865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of validation of accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in identifying moderate and severe carotid artery stenosis.
Shakhnovich I; Kiser D; Satiani B
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2010 Aug; 44(6):483-8. PubMed ID: 20843967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of ultrasound measurements of carotid stenosis compared to MRA and DSA.
Honish C; Sadanand V; Fladeland D; Chow V; Pirouzmand F
Can J Neurol Sci; 2005 Nov; 32(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16408576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.
Carpenter JP; Lexa FJ; Davis JT
Stroke; 1996 Apr; 27(4):695-9. PubMed ID: 8614933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Hammond CJ; McPherson SJ; Patel JV; Gough MJ
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18262445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal Peak Systolic Velocity Thresholds for Predicting Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Greater than or Equal to 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80%.
Tokunaga K; Koga M; Yoshimura S; Arihiro S; Suzuki R; Nagatsuka K; Toyoda K
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2016 Apr; 25(4):921-6. PubMed ID: 26851210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%-99%: a comparative study.
Chen JC; Salvian AJ; Taylor DC; Teal PA; Marotta TR; Hsiang YN
Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 9588510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical appraisal of the Carotid Duplex Consensus criteria in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.
AbuRahma AF; Srivastava M; Stone PA; Mousa AY; Jain A; Dean LS; Keiffer T; Emmett M
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Jan; 53(1):53-9; discussion 59-60. PubMed ID: 20951536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging.
Clevert DA; Johnson T; Michaely H; Jung EM; Flach PM; Strautz TI; Clevert DA; Reiser M; Schoenberg SO
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 16920314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New duplex ultrasound scan criteria for managing symptomatic 50% or greater carotid stenosis.
Winkelaar GB; Chen JC; Salvian AJ; Taylor DC; Teal PA; Hsiang YN
J Vasc Surg; 1999 Jun; 29(6):986-94. PubMed ID: 10359932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
