176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9588719)
1. Margin of resection in the management of primary melanoma.
Cascinelli N
Semin Surg Oncol; 1998 Jun; 14(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 9588719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial.
Karakousis CP; Balch CM; Urist MM; Ross MM; Smith TJ; Bartolucci AA
Ann Surg Oncol; 1996 Sep; 3(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 8876886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Haigh PI; DiFronzo LA; McCready DR
Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):419-26. PubMed ID: 14680348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2 cm vs. 4 cm excision margins for 740 patients with 1-4 mm melanomas.
Balch CM; Soong SJ; Smith T; Ross MI; Urist MM; Karakousis CP; Temple WJ; Mihm MC; Barnhill RL; Jewell WR; Wanebo HJ; Desmond R;
Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Mar; 8(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 11258773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous melanoma.
Zitelli JA; Brown CD; Hanusa BH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Sep; 37(3 Pt 1):422-9. PubMed ID: 9308558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of local recurrence and resection margins for stage I primary cutaneous malignant melanomas.
Zeitels J; LaRossa D; Hamilton R; Synnestvedt M; Schultz D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1988 May; 81(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 3362987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histopathologic excision margin affects local recurrence rate: analysis of 2681 patients with melanomas < or =2 mm thick.
McKinnon JG; Starritt EC; Scolyer RA; McCarthy WH; Thompson JF
Ann Surg; 2005 Feb; 241(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 15650644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Narrow resection of cutaneous melanoma.
Beasley K; Cartotto RC
J Cutan Med Surg; 1998 Jan; 2(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 9479077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Narrow excision (1-cm margin). A safe procedure for thin cutaneous melanoma.
Veronesi U; Cascinelli N
Arch Surg; 1991 Apr; 126(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 2009058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical margins in cutaneous melanoma (2 cm versus 5 cm for lesions measuring less than 2.1-mm thick).
Khayat D; Rixe O; Martin G; Soubrane C; Banzet M; Bazex JA; Lauret P; Vérola O; Auclerc G; Harper P; Banzet P;
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1941-6. PubMed ID: 12673721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: a randomised, multicentre trial.
Gillgren P; Drzewiecki KT; Niin M; Gullestad HP; Hellborg H; Månsson-Brahme E; Ingvar C; Ringborg U
Lancet; 2011 Nov; 378(9803):1635-42. PubMed ID: 22027547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Melanoma resection margin recommendations, unconventionally based on available facts.
Piepkorn M
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1998 Aug; 15(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 9711674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resection margins of 2 versus 5 cm for cutaneous malignant melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8 to 2.0 mm: randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group.
Ringborg U; Andersson R; Eldh J; Glaumann B; Hafström L; Jacobsson S; Jönsson PE; Johansson H; Krysander L; Lagerlöf B
Cancer; 1996 May; 77(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 8646678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of 2-cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1 to 4 mm). Results of a multi-institutional randomized surgical trial.
Balch CM; Urist MM; Karakousis CP; Smith TJ; Temple WJ; Drzewiecki K; Jewell WR; Bartolucci AA; Mihm MC; Barnhill R
Ann Surg; 1993 Sep; 218(3):262-7; discussion 267-9. PubMed ID: 8373269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: long-term follow-up of a multicentre, randomised trial.
Utjés D; Malmstedt J; Teras J; Drzewiecki K; Gullestad HP; Ingvar C; Eriksson H; Gillgren P
Lancet; 2019 Aug; 394(10197):471-477. PubMed ID: 31280965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Association Between Excision Margins and Local Recurrence in 11,290 Thin (T1) Primary Cutaneous Melanomas: A Case-Control Study.
MacKenzie Ross AD; Haydu LE; Quinn MJ; Saw RP; Shannon KF; Spillane AJ; Stretch JR; Scolyer RA; Thompson JF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1082-9. PubMed ID: 26561405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The case for wide local excision and regional node dissection for high-risk cutaneous melanoma.
Karakousis CP
Curr Opin Gen Surg; 1993; ():303-9. PubMed ID: 7583999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Safety margins in the excision of primary malignant melanoma. Proposals based on controlled clinical trials].
Hauschild A; Eiling S; Lischner S; Haacke TC; Christophers E
Hautarzt; 2001 Nov; 52(11):1003-10. PubMed ID: 11757453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma.
Sladden MJ; Balch C; Barzilai DA; Berg D; Freiman A; Handiside T; Hollis S; Lens MB; Thompson JF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD004835. PubMed ID: 19821334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wide versus narrow excision margins for high-risk, primary cutaneous melanomas: long-term follow-up of survival in a randomised trial.
Hayes AJ; Maynard L; Coombes G; Newton-Bishop J; Timmons M; Cook M; Theaker J; Bliss JM; Thomas JM; ; ;
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Feb; 17(2):184-192. PubMed ID: 26790922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
